[Bug fortran/39030] Support -fexcess-precision={standard,fast} also for Fortran

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39030

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> More than eight years later is there any point to keep this PR opened?

More than four months without feedback. Closing as WONTFIX

[Bug fortran/39030] Support -fexcess-precision={standard,fast} also for Fortran

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39030

--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
More than eight years later is there any point to keep this PR opened?

[Bug fortran/39030] Support -fexcess-precision={standard,fast} also for Fortran

[fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-07 20:05 
---
As long as we don't support IEEE arithmetic (with the intrinsic module),
getting IEEE results is not required by the standard. Making this an
enhancement, for later :)


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement
   Keywords|wrong-code  |
   Last reconfirmed|2009-02-09 08:15:05 |2009-05-07 20:05:30
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39030

[Bug fortran/39030] Support -fexcess-precision={standard,fast} also for Fortran

[pault at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-09 08:15 ---
Coo!  I did't know anything about PR323.  I now don't want to know anything
about it:-)

Confirmed

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-02-09 08:15:05
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39030