[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 04:36 --- Subject: Bug 41278 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Dec 1 04:36:30 2009 New Revision: 154863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154863 Log: 2009-11-30 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/41278 Backport from mainline. * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_array_transpose): Delete unnecessary assert. Modified: branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 04:40 --- Subject: Bug 41278 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Dec 1 04:40:14 2009 New Revision: 154864 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154864 Log: 2009-11-30 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/41278 * gfortran.dg/array_function_5.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_function_5.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 04:41 --- Fixed on Trunk and 4.4 -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-27 08:34 --- (In reply to comment #10) Just a note of appreciation to Chris for reporting this bug and providing a simple and extremely useful test case. When I get a moment, I will add Chris to the test case as recognition. Shall we backport this fix to 4.4? I would say one should: The fix is extremely simple and having TRANSPOSE is not uncommon in Fortran. (Having TRANSPOSE(scalar operator array) is less common, though.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 13:02 --- This is what I would call a very fundamental bug, at the soul of what fortran is suppose to do. I am looking at it but think it would go better with a team effort here. Anyone have any thoughts about it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 14:35 --- I think we need to gfc_walk_op_expr before we try to gfc_conv_array_transpose -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 17:50 --- Removing the assert appears to fix this. Testing now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 19:05 --- Subject: Bug 41278 Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 26 19:05:37 2009 New Revision: 154680 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154680 Log: 2009-11-26 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/41278 * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_array_transpose): Delete unnecessary assert. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 19:10 --- Subject: Bug 41278 Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 26 19:10:29 2009 New Revision: 154681 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154681 Log: 2009-11-26 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/41278 * gfortran.dg/array_function_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_function_5.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 21:46 --- The following assert is wrong: gcc_assert (src_info-dimen == 2); (and has been removed in the comment patch of comment 7). I only want to link to an email which gives the reason why. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-11/msg00212.html -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 22:11 --- Just a note of appreciation to Chris for reporting this bug and providing a simple and extremely useful test case. When I get a moment, I will add Chris to the test case as recognition. Shall we backport this fix to 4.4? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 16:21 --- Not a regression. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 14:54 --- ICE confirmed with test case on 4.5 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-05 15:19:09 date|| Version|unknown |4.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
[Bug fortran/41278] internal compiler error related to matmul and transpose
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-09-05 15:34 --- 853 gcc_assert (src_info-dimen == 2); (gdb) list 848 dest_ss = se-ss; 849 850 src_info = src_ss-data.info; 851 dest_info = dest_ss-data.info; 852 gcc_assert (dest_info-dimen == 2); 853 gcc_assert (src_info-dimen == 2); 854 855 /* Get a descriptor for EXPR. */ 856 gfc_init_se (src_se, NULL); 857 gfc_conv_expr_descriptor (src_se, expr, src_ss); -- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||32834 nThis|| Known to fail||4.3.1 4.4.0 4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
