[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 12:43 --- Subject: Bug 41850 Author: burnus Date: Sun Nov 1 12:43:42 2009 New Revision: 153793 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153793 Log: 2009-11-01 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de PR fortran/41850 * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Deallocate intent-out variables only when present. Remove unneccessary present check. 2009-11-01 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de PR fortran/41850 * gfortran.dg/intent_out_6.f90: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intent_out_6.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41850
[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 14:35 --- Subject: Bug 41850 Author: burnus Date: Sun Nov 1 14:35:40 2009 New Revision: 153794 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153794 Log: 2009-11-01 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de PR fortran/41850 * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Deallocate intent-out variables only when present. 2009-11-01 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de PR fortran/41850 * gfortran.dg/intent_out_6.f90: New testcase. Added: branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intent_out_6.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41850
[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 14:36 --- FIXED on the trunk (4.5) and on the 4.4 branch. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41850
[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-30 10:16 --- (In reply to comment #3) Anything else? Seemingly yes: gfortran.dg/optional_dim_3.f90 gfortran.dg/random_4.f90 gfortran.dg/random_7.f90 For optional_dim_3.f90, one has: - D.1516 = n2 != 0B ? (integer(kind=4)) *n2 : 1; - _gfortran_cshift1_4 (atmp.38, parm.34, atmp.35, D.1516); + _gfortran_cshift1_4 (atmp.38, parm.34, atmp.35, n2); which leads to: Fortran runtime error: Argument 'DIM' is out of range in call to 'CSHIFT' And for random*.f90 Fortran runtime error: RANDOM_SEED should have at most one argument present. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41850
[Bug fortran/41850] Wrong-code with optional allocatable arrays
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-30 14:33 --- Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-10/msg00246.html -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortra ||n/2009-10/msg00246.html http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41850