[Bug fortran/43747] [4.6 Regression] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1551
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-14 13:26 --- After revision 158291 I get [macbook] f90/bug% time gfc pr19925_1.f90 pr19925_1.f90:2.27: INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I(N)=(/(MOD(K,2),K=1,N)/) 1 Error: The number of elements in the array constructor at (1) requires an increase of the allowed 65535 upper limit. See -fmax-array-constructor option 1.576u 0.019s 0:01.60 98.7% 0+0k 0+19io 0pf+0w [macbook] f90/bug% time gfc pr19925_1_db.f90 pr19925_1_db.f90:2.27: INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I(N)=(/(MOD(K,2),K=1,N)/) 1 Error: The number of elements in the array constructor at (1) requires an increase of the allowed 65535 upper limit. See -fmax-array-constructor option 1.587u 0.023s 0:01.94 82.4% 0+0k 0+17io 0pf+0w [macbook] f90/bug% time gfc pr19925_1.f90 -fmax-array-constructor=10 3.330u 0.177s 0:03.51 99.7% 0+0k 0+25io 0pf+0w [macbook] f90/bug% time gfc pr19925_1_db.f90 -fmax-array-constructor=10 3.432u 0.191s 0:03.87 93.5% 0+0k 0+9io 0pf+0w [macbook] f90/bug% a.out 1 0 0 1 So no more ICE, and the compilation with -fmax-array-constructor=10 is now more than two order of magnitude faster (nice!-). So closing as fixed. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43747
[Bug fortran/43747] [4.6 Regression] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1551
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 19:03 --- I don't see the failure on linux-x86-64. I am building on Cygwin to see whta shows up there. I seem to recall a patch that changed a fatal error to a non-fatal somewhere. I will have a look tonight. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43747
[Bug fortran/43747] [4.6 Regression] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1551
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 20:56 --- (In reply to comment #1) I don't see the failure on linux-x86-64. I am building on Cygwin to see whta shows up there. I seem to recall a patch that changed a fatal error to a non-fatal somewhere. I will have a look tonight. I can reproduce the problem on linux-x86-64: f951: internal compiler error: in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1551 -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC build triplet|x86_64-apple-darwin10 | GCC host triplet|x86_64-apple-darwin10 | GCC target triplet|x86_64-apple-darwin10 | Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-13 20:56:57 date|| Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43747
[Bug fortran/43747] [4.6 Regression] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1551
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 01:32 --- OK, I see it now. This is a little different from our previous encounters with overly big constructors. In fact, the code we had in place is still there, so we have whacked something. The test case does not fail at 65535 and does fail at 65536. I will study it a bit, but this may not be a quick one. (Unless I get lucky) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43747
[Bug fortran/43747] [4.6 Regression] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1551
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 05:08 --- Easier then I thought. Patch submitted for approval. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43747
[Bug fortran/43747] [4.6 Regression] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1551
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 05:17 --- Subject: Bug 43747 Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Apr 14 05:16:59 2010 New Revision: 158290 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158290 Log: 2010-04-14 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/43747 * constructor.c: Fix typo in comment. * expr.c (find_array_section): Add check for max array limit. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/constructor.c trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43747
[Bug fortran/43747] [4.6 Regression] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1551
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 05:27 --- Subject: Bug 43747 Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Apr 14 05:27:29 2010 New Revision: 158291 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158291 Log: 2010-04-14 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/43747 gfortran.dg/initialization_24.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/initialization_24.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43747
