[Bug fortran/45190] Compile-time error on valid code: can't convert TYPE(_gfortran_iso_c_binding_c_ptr) to TYPE(c_ptr)
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-05 15:46 --- The problem also occurs with 4.6.0. Note, if you remove the ', only : c_ptr' in NAG_J_TYPES, the code compiles and produces laptop:kargl[214] gfc4x -o z tr.f90 laptop:kargl[215] ./z C_ASSOCIATED = T ASSOCIATED = T So, there appears to be a problem with using an ONLY clause with ISO C binding. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-08-05 15:46:24 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45190
[Bug fortran/45190] Compile-time error on valid code: can't convert TYPE(_gfortran_iso_c_binding_c_ptr) to TYPE(c_ptr)
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-05 16:03 --- The problem also occurs with 4.6.0. As well as with 4.4.4. Note that an other pr related to the use of ONLY (pr44702) has been fixed by Tobias Burnus: I CCed him. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45190
[Bug fortran/45190] Compile-time error on valid code: can't convert TYPE(_gfortran_iso_c_binding_c_ptr) to TYPE(c_ptr)
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-05 17:51 --- I think it is the same as pr37829. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37829 *** -- mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45190