[Bug fortran/46772] libquadmath: Build failure - strtod: static declaration of 'strtod' follows non-static declaration

2010-12-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46772

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-08 
15:10:29 UTC ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00664.html


[Bug fortran/46772] libquadmath: Build failure - strtod: static declaration of 'strtod' follows non-static declaration

2010-12-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46772

--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-08 
22:35:56 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Dec  8 22:35:52 2010
New Revision: 167608

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167608
Log:
2010-12-08  Tobias Burnus  bur...@net-b.de

PR fortran/46772
* gdtoa/gdtoa.h: Include stdlib.h instead of declare strtod.
* gdtoa/gdtoaimp.h: Don't declare strtod.


Modified:
trunk/libquadmath/ChangeLog
trunk/libquadmath/gdtoa/gdtoa.h
trunk/libquadmath/gdtoa/gdtoaimp.h


[Bug fortran/46772] libquadmath: Build failure - strtod: static declaration of 'strtod' follows non-static declaration

2010-12-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46772

Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-08 
22:43:16 UTC ---
FIXED for GCC / libquadmath.

The static issue of MinGW is tracked at
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3132404group_id=2435atid=102435


[Bug fortran/46772] libquadmath: Build failure - strtod: static declaration of 'strtod' follows non-static declaration

2010-12-03 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46772

Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2010.12.03 12:38:27
 CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-03 12:38:27 
UTC ---
Fix looks reasonable to me.
That mingw.org defines this function static is more a bug on their side.