[Bug fortran/51634] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic operators

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51634

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/51634] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic operators

2012-01-19 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51634

Tobias Burnus  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus  2012-01-19 
08:13:13 UTC ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.7).

Thanks for the patch, Paul!


[Bug fortran/51634] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic operators

2012-01-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51634

--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas  2012-01-18 20:52:51 
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 20:52:48 2012
New Revision: 183287

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183287
Log:
2012-01-18  Paul Thomas  

PR fortran/51634
* trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Deallocate allocatable
components of temporary class arguments.

2012-01-18  Paul Thomas  

PR fortran/51634
* gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_12.f03: New.
* gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_13.f03: New.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_12.f03
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_13.f03
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


[Bug fortran/51634] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic operators

2012-01-13 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51634

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus  2012-01-13 
22:17:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Fixed on trunk as long as explicit allocations are inserted, as below.
> I will raise a separate PR for the lack of automatic allocate on assign for
> class objects with derived type components.

The test case now works since the commit of PR 48351 (and thus I closed PR
51733). The following allocates of comment 1 are still needed, though -
otherwise the code is invalid:
 function multiply(lhs,rhs)
   allocate(multiply)
 program main
   allocate (g%f(2), source = [1.0, 2.0])

 * * *

Unfortunately, the original program still fails. New test case; produces with
ifort 12.1:
   6.00   12.0   18.0
   24.0   30.0   36.0

Fails with gfortran at:
  Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc()
at 0x4C28C3E: free (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
by 0x401BD0: MAIN__ (test.f90:34)

The "free" issue only occurs for:
  fireworks = fireworks + fireworks * dt
It works with
  fireworks = fireworks + fireworks
or with
  fireworks = fireworks * dt


I am not sure why it fails, but the following looks a bit odd:

struct soop_stars D.1952;
class.8._data = (struct soop_stars *) &D.1952;
...
if (class.8.position.data != 0B)
  __builtin_free ((void *) class.8.position.data);

Shouldn't that be: "class.8._data.position.data" (not the "_data")?


module soop_stars_class
  implicit none
  type soop_stars
real, dimension(:), allocatable :: position,velocity
  contains
procedure :: total
procedure :: product
generic :: operator(+) => total
generic :: operator(*) => product
  end type
contains
  type(soop_stars) function product(lhs,rhs)
class(soop_stars) ,intent(in) :: lhs
real ,intent(in) :: rhs
product%position = lhs%position*rhs
product%velocity = lhs%velocity*rhs
  end function

  type(soop_stars) function total(lhs,rhs)
class(soop_stars) ,intent(in) :: lhs,rhs
total%position = lhs%position + rhs%position
total%velocity = lhs%velocity + rhs%velocity
  end function
end module

program main
  use soop_stars_class ,only : soop_stars
  implicit none
  type(soop_stars) :: fireworks
  real :: dt
  fireworks%position = [1,2,3]
  fireworks%velocity = [4,5,6]
  dt = 5
  fireworks = fireworks + fireworks*dt
  print *, fireworks%position
  print *, fireworks%velocity
end program


[Bug fortran/51634] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic operators

2012-01-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51634

Paul Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas  2012-01-02 13:28:13 
UTC ---
Fixed on trunk as long as explicit allocations are inserted, as below.

I will raise a separate PR for the lack of automatic allocate on assign for
class objects with derived type components.

Thanks for the report.

Paul

module field_module
  implicit none
  private
  public :: field
  type :: field
real, allocatable :: f(:)
  contains
procedure :: multiply_real  => multiply
procedure :: copy   => copy_field
generic   :: operator(*)=> multiply_real
generic   :: assignment(=)  => copy
  end type

contains
  subroutine copy_field (lhs, rhs)
class(field), intent(inout) :: lhs
class(field), intent(in) :: rhs
if (allocated (lhs%f)) deallocate (lhs%f)
allocate (lhs%f(size (rhs%f, 1)))
lhs%f = rhs%f
  end subroutine

  function multiply(lhs,rhs)
class(field) ,intent(in) :: lhs
real ,intent(in)  :: rhs
class(field) ,allocatable :: multiply
integer :: i
allocate(multiply, source = field([(0.0, i = 1, size (lhs%f, 1))]))
multiply%f = lhs%f * rhs
  end function
end module field_module

program main
  use field_module
  implicit none
  type(field) :: f, g
  real :: dt, half
  allocate (g%f(2), source = [1.0, 2.0])
  dt = 7
  half = 0.5
  f = g * dt * half
  print *, f%f
end program main