[Bug fortran/53521] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory leak with zero-sized array constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] |Regression] Memory leak |Memory leak with zero-sized |with zero-sized array |array constructor |constructor | Known to fail|4.8.0 | --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-31 14:28:46 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu May 31 14:28:41 2012 New Revision: 188062 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188062 Log: 2012-05-31 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de PR fortran/53521 * trans.c (gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status): Properly handle the case size == 0. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.c --- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-06-01 07:42:41 UTC --- Thanks Tobias... this fixes the issue I saw for CP2K. From some further tests I did, I couldn't see any negative side effects. I had a look at other gcc branches, the patch applies flawlessly to 4.7 and 4.6 (I did not have a 4.5 branch around). I would be very happy to see it integrated in 4.7.1 and 4.6.4, as it is nearly impossible to fully code around this in CP2K. Array constructors are used much, and it is hard to guess which ones could be zero-sized.
[Bug fortran/53521] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory leak with zero-sized array constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01 15:08:29 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jun 1 15:08:24 2012 New Revision: 188111 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188111 Log: 2012-06-01 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de PR fortran/53521 * trans.c (gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status): Properly handle the case size == 0. Modified: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/fortran/trans.c
[Bug fortran/53521] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory leak with zero-sized array constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01 20:06:45 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jun 1 20:06:39 2012 New Revision: 188124 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188124 Log: 2012-06-01 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de PR fortran/53521 * trans.c (gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status): Properly handle the case size == 0. Modified: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/fortran/trans.c
[Bug fortran/53521] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory leak with zero-sized array constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01 20:40:45 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jun 1 20:40:36 2012 New Revision: 188125 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188125 Log: 2012-06-01 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de PR fortran/53521 * trans.c (gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status): Properly handle the case size == 0. Modified: branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/fortran/trans.c
