[Bug fortran/55099] Surprising but valid 'PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute' error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55099 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Severity|normal |enhancement
[Bug fortran/55099] Surprising but valid 'PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute' error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55099 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Improving the message will be quite trivial once an agreement is found about the improvement. Would the addition of "This name has not been declared as an array or a function." be OK? Can someone find a better one?
[Bug fortran/55099] Surprising but valid 'PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute' error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55099 --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > Improving the message will be quite trivial once an agreement is found about > the improvement. Would the addition of "This name has not been declared as > an array or a function." be OK? Can someone find a better one? ‘num_proc_2d’ has not been declared as an array or a function. would indeed be close to what ifort provides, and I think is an improvement.
[Bug fortran/55099] Surprising but valid 'PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute' error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55099 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2014-01-18 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Still present at r206753.
[Bug fortran/55099] Surprising but valid 'PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute' error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55099 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|Surprising 'PROCEDURE |Surprising but valid |attribute conflicts with|'PROCEDURE attribute |INTENT attribute' error |conflicts with INTENT ||attribute' error --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-27 17:29:00 UTC --- I don't know whether you'd prefer NAG's message: Inconsistent usage of NUM_PROC_2D. Nor I am not sure that Intel's message is much better than gfortran's or NAG's: This name has not been declared as an array or a function. How about the following (which of course implies that the users didn't intent to use an array - if they did, Intel's becomes more helpful.) PathScale/Oracles/Open64/Crayftn have: NUM_PROC_2D has the INTENT attribute, therefore it must not be used as an external function name. PGI has Illegal attribute - intent specified for dummy subprogram argument num_proc_2d
[Bug fortran/55099] Surprising but valid 'PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute' error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55099 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat ||dot ethz.ch --- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-27 17:38:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) How about the following (which of course implies that the users didn't intent to use an array - if they did, Intel's becomes more helpful.) Indeed, I was coding this with the intent of declaring it as an array, no doubt, passing an array is much more common than passing a procedure. Note that intel's location is also more useful in that case. I think the usefulness of Intel's message lies in the fact that it suggests the common cause of the error. Even with the experience I have, I first started to look for a procedure with the same name as the variable.
