[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 60561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #16 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed with commit r221627.
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #15 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Tue Mar 24 11:47:45 2015 New Revision: 221627 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221627&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-24 Andre Vehreschild PR fortran/55901 * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_structure): Fixed indendation. Using integer_zero_node now instead of explicitly constructing a integer constant zero node. (gfc_conv_derived_to_class): Add handling of _len component, i.e., when the rhs has a string_length then assign that to class' _len, else assign 0. (gfc_conv_intrinsic_to_class): Likewise. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fix available with: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00074.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00075.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00085.html and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00086.html
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 18 12:21:38 2015 New Revision: 219814 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219814&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-01-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/55901 * primary.c (gfc_match_varspec): Exclude dangling associate- names with dimension 0 from being counted as arrays. * resolve.c (resolve_assoc_var): Sub-strings are permissible for associate-names, so exclude characters from the test for misuse as arrays. * trans-decl.c (gfc_get_symbol_decl): Associate-names can use the hidden string length variable of their associated target. Signal this by setting 'length' to a constant, if the decl for the string length is a variable. 2015-01-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/55901 * gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03: Allow test for character with automatic length. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/primary.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #12 from Andre Vehreschild --- Hi Paul, hi Tobias, I am guilty in asking both of you to look at the issue. I would be very happy, if one of you two can really have a look into the issue and notify the other one, that he found a reason for the issue and may be already has a solution. I just want to get the issue resolved but not produce duplicate work. Regards, Andre On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 13:16:25 + "paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com" wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 > > --- Comment #11 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com > --- Hi Harald, > > Happy New Year! I have been away in Claifornia these last few weeks and > just got back last night. > > I am working with Andre on pr60255 tonight. Once this is done, we should be > in a position to fix pr55901 and have it do something useful! > > Cheers > > Paul > > On 6 January 2015 at 20:50, anlauf at gmx dot de > wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 > > > > --- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf --- > > (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #9) > > > By the way, the patch of comment 8 bootstraps and regtests OK > > > > > > Paul > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > any news on that patch? > > > > Harald > > > > -- > > You are receiving this mail because: > > You are on the CC list for the bug. > > >
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #11 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Harald, Happy New Year! I have been away in Claifornia these last few weeks and just got back last night. I am working with Andre on pr60255 tonight. Once this is done, we should be in a position to fix pr55901 and have it do something useful! Cheers Paul On 6 January 2015 at 20:50, anlauf at gmx dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 > > --- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf --- > (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #9) > > By the way, the patch of comment 8 bootstraps and regtests OK > > > > Paul > > Hi Paul, > > any news on that patch? > > Harald > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. >
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #9) > By the way, the patch of comment 8 bootstraps and regtests OK > > Paul Hi Paul, any news on that patch? Harald
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #9 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- By the way, the patch of comment 8 bootstraps and regtests OK Paul
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot c ||om --- Comment #8 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 34281 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34281&action=edit Partial patch for the PR This patch removes the error and correctly converts the code, except for the lack of a string length for the unlimited polymorphic entities/components in both the testcase here and oo.f90. Andre is attending to this but I will in the meantime submit this patch. Cheers Paul
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org, ||vehre at gmx dot de --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #6) > Any news on this one? Dear Harald, I'll take a look at it tonight. Andre is working on a patch that will allow the likes of oo.f90 to work correctly with characters. This bug gets in the way and so I will see what can be done :-) It should be trivial. Cheers Paul
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf --- Any news on this one?
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-09-18 CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here is another code which triggers this error: ftp://ftp.numerical.rl.ac.uk/pub/MRandC/oo.f90 (cf. also https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/aRz3HMpblTs)
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf 2013-04-08 18:16:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I am newbie to fortran, Can you please explain me in detail with an example. > > Thanks in advance Replace character(len=*) :: s in your code by e.g. character(len=20) :: s Then it will compile work. This is a general Fortran issue and has nothing to do with gfortran. Note: the bugzilla should not be used to learn about Fortran. Use a textbook about Fortran or the newsgroup "comp.lang.fortran" which you can access via google groups.
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #3 from pdande1 at dow dot com 2013-04-08 17:41:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > program characterconversions > > integer :: i=123 > > character(len=*) :: s > > write(s,*) i > > print *,s > > end program > > > > I am getting the below error while executing the above program (gcc version > > 4.8.0 20130302 (experimental) [trunk revision 196403] (GCC)) > > > > Error: Entity with assumed character length must be a dummy argument or a > > PARAMETER| > > ||=== Build finished: 1 errors, 0 warnings (0 minutes, 0 seconds) ===| > > Your example has nothing to do with the original PR. > > It is also invalid code: you must not use assumed character length (i.e. > len=*) > in a main program. Hi Harald, I am newbie to fortran, Can you please explain me in detail with an example. Thanks in advance
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf 2013-04-08 17:29:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > program characterconversions > integer :: i=123 > character(len=*) :: s > write(s,*) i > print *,s > end program > > I am getting the below error while executing the above program (gcc version > 4.8.0 20130302 (experimental) [trunk revision 196403] (GCC)) > > Error: Entity with assumed character length must be a dummy argument or a > PARAMETER| > ||=== Build finished: 1 errors, 0 warnings (0 minutes, 0 seconds) ===| Your example has nothing to do with the original PR. It is also invalid code: you must not use assumed character length (i.e. len=*) in a main program.
[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 pdande1 at dow dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pdande1 at dow dot com --- Comment #1 from pdande1 at dow dot com 2013-04-08 17:13:19 UTC --- program characterconversions integer :: i=123 character(len=*) :: s write(s,*) i print *,s end program I am getting the below error while executing the above program (gcc version 4.8.0 20130302 (experimental) [trunk revision 196403] (GCC)) Error: Entity with assumed character length must be a dummy argument or a PARAMETER| ||=== Build finished: 1 errors, 0 warnings (0 minutes, 0 seconds) ===|
