[Bug fortran/57778] Missing warning for -Wimplicit-procedure for dummy arguments

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> From Richard Maine's answer at
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/3idUN6kMjjo
> it looks to me that the warning expectation is wrong. Am I making a mistake?
> If not, I'll close this PR as INVALID.

No feedback, closing.

[Bug fortran/57778] Missing warning for -Wimplicit-procedure for dummy arguments

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed||2015-09-13
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
>From Richard Maine's answer at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/3idUN6kMjjo it looks
to me that the warning expectation is wrong. Am I making a mistake? If not,
I'll close this PR as INVALID.

[Bug fortran/57778] Missing warning for -Wimplicit-procedure for dummy arguments

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus  ---
Additionally, I wonder whether one wants to have a means to require an explicit
interface, i.e. not just an explicit EXTERNAL (with implicit interface).