[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438

--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
*** Bug 68889 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438

--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
Related to/ duplicate of pr71906?

[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed||2015-10-29
 Blocks||24546
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
Any progress?


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
[Bug 24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus  ---
Regarding (a), see also https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-06/msg00113.html

[Bug fortran/59438] DWARF: Fortran mishandles ALLOCATABLE/ASSOCIATED in debug output

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59438

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus  ---
Regarding (a): I think we should consider to simply use the same structure of
arrays ("struct array_descr_info") also for scalars. Besides that it already
exists, it is probably also sensible when we will handle coarrays, cf. PR49566.

(d) We also need to handle DW_AT_allocated/associated for CLASS, which means
that the variable's DW_AT_allocated must point to ._data.data instead of
to .data.