[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #17 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Sarantis Pantazis from comment #15) > > It seems it is something trivial but my knowledge outside of fortran is > still rather limited... > Bugzilla is not a Fortran User support forum. But, to aid in your suffering. Remove ALL installed versions of gfortran. Make sure that there are no leftover gfortrans or f951 in your path and remove all old *.mod files. Now, re-install the latest and greatest version of gfortran from trunk.
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #16 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Sarantis Pantazis from comment #13) > > Did you update the compiler name in your makefile? > > I have left the line COMPILER=gfortran at the top as it is and I have > defined an alias in my ~/.bashrc for gfortran pointing to the newly > installed location (alias gfortran='$HOME/latestGcc/gcc-build/gcc/gfortran'). I think that aliases in a Makefile are a bad idea. You need to make sure that the aliases are exported from the invoking shell. On my system I get: % alias gfc alias gfc='gfortran' % cat Makefile SHELL = /bin/bash aliastest: echo "Running make: alias:"; alias % make aliastest echo "Running make: alias:"; alias Running make: alias: So no aliases are set! Try "man bash" and search for "expand_aliases". I use a symbolic link gfc-trunk (you might prefer gfortran-latest) to the installed binary and use this in the makefile.
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #15 from Sarantis Pantazis --- > Did you install the compiler (i.e. run 'make install')? Yes, I did. I read http://gcc.gnu.org/install/index.html and made a summary of the steps I followed (attached here). I also kept a log of "make" and "make install" (also attached here). I also tried changing COMPILER=gfortran to COMPILER=/home/sarantis/latestGcc/gcc-build/gcc/gfortran and got the following error: gfortran: error trying to exec 'f951': execvp: No such file or directory > Do you get gzip'ed modules if you use .../gcc/f951 instead of > .../gcc/gfortran? Compiling with COMPILER=/home/sarantis/latestGcc/gcc-build/gcc/f951 leads to zipped files and no IMPLICIT_PURE. But f951 does not accept -c so no executable was produced. It seems it is something trivial but my knowledge outside of fortran is still rather limited...
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Sarantis Pantazis from comment #13) > > Did you update the compiler name in your makefile? > > I have left the line COMPILER=gfortran at the top as it is and I have > defined an alias in my ~/.bashrc for gfortran pointing to the newly > installed location (alias gfortran='$HOME/latestGcc/gcc-build/gcc/gfortran'). > > > > cp MOD/generalfunctions.mod generalFunctions.mod.gz > > gunzip generalFunctions.mod.gz > > I get "gzip: generalFunctions.mod.gz: not in gzip format". But anyway, the > mod file is readable so I can skip to the third line. > This means you are using an old compiler. Did you install the compiler (i.e. run 'make install')? Do you get gzip'ed modules if you use .../gcc/f951 instead of .../gcc/gfortran?
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #13 from Sarantis Pantazis --- > Did you update the compiler name in your makefile? I have left the line COMPILER=gfortran at the top as it is and I have defined an alias in my ~/.bashrc for gfortran pointing to the newly installed location (alias gfortran='$HOME/latestGcc/gcc-build/gcc/gfortran'). > cp MOD/generalfunctions.mod generalFunctions.mod.gz > gunzip generalFunctions.mod.gz I get "gzip: generalFunctions.mod.gz: not in gzip format". But anyway, the mod file is readable so I can skip to the third line. > grep PURE generalFunctions.mod UNKNOWN-INTENT MODULE-PROC DECL UNKNOWN 0 0 SUBROUTINE IMPLICIT_PURE) ( MODULE-PROC DECL UNKNOWN 0 0 FUNCTION IMPLICIT_PURE) (REAL 8 0 0 0 REAL So, I still get IMPLICIT_PURE. And when I run it I still get the infinite loop as well, so I guess I missed something during the installation?
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Yes, I did; I used "make clean" first (also "rm *.o *.f90 *.s" in the main > folder to clean up the files generated by -save-temps). Did you update the compiler name in your makefile? I have just been caught by that when comparing the results in the bug_OPT1mode_withWRITE and bug_OPT1mode_noWRITE directories. With the right compiler for both, I get 2000105810051017 Can you do the following cp MOD/generalfunctions.mod generalFunctions.mod.gz gunzip generalFunctions.mod.gz grep PURE generalFunctions.mod you should only see UNKNOWN-PROC DECL UNKNOWN 0 0 INTRINSIC FUNCTION PURE) () (CHARACTER 1 0 UNKNOWN-PROC DECL UNKNOWN 0 0 INTRINSIC FUNCTION PURE) () (CHARACTER 1 0 i.e., no IMPLICIT_PURE.
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #11 from Sarantis Pantazis --- Yes, I did; I used "make clean" first (also "rm *.o *.f90 *.s" in the main folder to clean up the files generated by -save-temps).
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Thank you for the fast response and effort. I have installed gcc from svn > but the results are still the same. Perhaps I mis-installed something? > Attached you will find the logs and the installation workflow. > Is step #14 perhaps wrong? Did you recompile the module defining random()?
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #9 from Sarantis Pantazis --- Thank you for the fast response and effort. I have installed gcc from svn but the results are still the same. Perhaps I mis-installed something? Attached you will find the logs and the installation workflow. Is step #14 perhaps wrong? The output of gfortran -v seems correct though. Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/home/sarantis/latestGcc/gcc-build/gcc/gfortran Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/home/sarantis/latestGcc --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --disable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20140323 (experimental) (GCC)
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #8 from Sarantis Pantazis --- Created attachment 32430 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32430&action=edit Compilation logs and installation workflow
[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|4.8.3 |4.7.4 Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regression]|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] |Function with side effect |Function with side effect |removed by the optimizer. |removed by the optimizer. --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- FIXED on the 4.7 and 4.8 branches and on the trunk (to become 4.9.0). Thanks for the report and sorry for the breakage!
