[Bug fortran/65532] [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code (D1MACH)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin --- Fixed. Closing.
[Bug fortran/65532] [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code (D1MACH)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin --- Author: mikael Date: Wed Mar 25 10:15:46 2015 New Revision: 221657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221657&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix regression introduced at revision 221586. PR fortran/64952 PR fortran/65532 fortran/ * gfortran.h (struct gfc_namespace): New field 'types_resolved'. * resolve.c (resolve_types): Return early if field 'types_resolved' is set. Set 'types_resolved' at the end. testsuite/ * gfortran.dg/data_initialized_3.f90: New. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/data_initialized_3.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug fortran/65532] [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code (D1MACH)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- ||patches/2015-03/msg01272.ht ||ml --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01272.html
[Bug fortran/65532] [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code (D1MACH)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- As noted in 64952, this prevents 481.wrf from SPEC2006 being built
[Bug fortran/65532] [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code (D1MACH)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
[Bug fortran/65532] [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code (D1MACH)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin --- With r221586, procedure d1mach is resolved more than once. At the first time resolve_values is called, the problematic variables (diver, large, etc) have a NULL sym->value, which is set afterwards in resolve_data. On the second call, the value is non-null and the error is produced.
[Bug fortran/65532] [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code (D1MACH)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2015-03-24 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- It indeed is r221586.
[Bug fortran/65532] [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code (D1MACH)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I suspect r221586: I don't see the errors at r221569. > I found a workaround by changing the dimension of the arrays in > lines 7-11 to 2 instead of 4 (the original code also supports > dated hardware). Confirmed.
[Bug fortran/65532] [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code (D1MACH)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0 Known to fail||5.0 --- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf --- I found a workaround by changing the dimension of the arrays in lines 7-11 to 2 instead of 4 (the original code also supports dated hardware).
