[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

2016-03-12 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520

Jerry DeLisle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle  ---
Closing

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

2016-03-12 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520

--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle  ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 13 00:19:08 2016
New Revision: 234167

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234167=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-03-12  Jerry DeLisle  
Harold Anlauf  

PR fortran/69520
* invoke.texi: Explain use of the 'no-' construct within the
-fcheck= option.
* options.c (gfc_handle_runtime_check_option): Enable use of
'no-' prefix for the various options with -fcheck= to allow
negating previously enabled check options.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
trunk/gcc/fortran/options.c

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

2016-03-09 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520

--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle  ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #6)
> Hi Jerry,
> 
> do you think my suggested patch could be applied before the 6 release?
> 
> Thanks,
> Harald

This is my plan. Just out of town for a few days. Maybe this weekend.

I have reviewed it already and it looks good.

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

2016-03-08 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520

--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf  ---
Hi Jerry,

do you think my suggested patch could be applied before the 6 release?

Thanks,
Harald

On 01/28/16 00:31, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520
> 
> Jerry DeLisle  changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
>  CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
>Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |jvdelisle at gcc dot 
> gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle  ---
> Harald, if you have commits rights or are interested in getting such, let me
> know and we can let you take this one. (Otherwise I will do so)
>

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

2016-01-29 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520

--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf  ---
Created attachment 37524
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37524=edit
Patch which uses prefix "no-"

Here you go.

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

2016-01-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2016-01-28
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> I don't have a strong opinion on whether the prefix for disabling
> should be "no" or "no-", or whether both should be accepted.
> The present patch implements the first variant.  If there is some
> guideline to use the latter, the changes are obviously trivial.

I'ld prefer "no-".

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

2016-01-28 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520

--- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf  ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #2)
> Harald, if you have commits rights or are interested in getting such, let me
> know and we can let you take this one. (Otherwise I will do so)

Hi Jerry,

I'd be glad if you can take this one.  If one day I have a larger
contribution, we might reconsider, but it's not worth the hassle
now.

Thanks,
Harald

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

2016-01-27 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520

--- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf  ---
The patch in comment #0 regtests ok on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

Possible ChangeLog entry:

2016-01-27  ...

PR fortran/69520
* options.c: Enhance -fcheck by reversal of specifications.
* invoke.texi: Document enhancement of -fcheck.

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

2016-01-27 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520

Jerry DeLisle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |jvdelisle at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle  ---
Harald, if you have commits rights or are interested in getting such, let me
know and we can let you take this one. (Otherwise I will do so)