[Bug fortran/77584] Unclassifiable statement error with procedure pointer using template named "structure_"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584 --- Comment #1 from Fritz Reese --- Created attachment 39618 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39618&action=edit Patch for PR 77584 The attached patch fixes the issue. 2016-09-14 Fritz Reese PR fortran/77584 * gcc/fortran/decl.c (match_record_decl, gfc_match_decl_type_spec): Fixes to handling of structure/record from declaration-type-spec. * gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dec_structure_15.f90: New testcase.
[Bug fortran/77584] Unclassifiable statement error with procedure pointer using template named "structure_"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584 --- Comment #2 from foreese at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: foreese Date: Mon Sep 19 11:32:09 2016 New Revision: 240230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-09-19 Fritz Reese PR fortran/77584 * gcc/fortran/decl.c (match_record_decl, gfc_match_decl_type_spec): Fixes to handling of structure/record from declaration-type-spec. * gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dec_structure_15.f90: New testcase. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/decl.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug fortran/77584] Unclassifiable statement error with procedure pointer using template named "structure_"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2016-09-30 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Isn't this PR fixed?
[Bug fortran/77584] Unclassifiable statement error with procedure pointer using template named "structure_"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584 --- Comment #4 from Fritz Reese --- Yes, fixed in r240230, I can't change the bug status myself or I would've https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-09/msg00105.html On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 21:06 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584 > > Dominique d'Humieres changed: > >What|Removed |Added > > > Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING >Last reconfirmed||2016-09-30 > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > > --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Isn't this PR fixed? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug fortran/77584] Unclassifiable statement error with procedure pointer using template named "structure_"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Yes, fixed in r240230, I can't change the bug status myself or I would've This is strange: if you have write access, you should be able to change the status.
[Bug fortran/77584] Unclassifiable statement error with procedure pointer using template named "structure_"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fritzoreese at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from Fritz Reese --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5) > > Yes, fixed in r240230, I can't change the bug status myself or I would've > > This is strange: if you have write access, you should be able to change the > status. Maybe it's because I created my bugzilla account before I got write access? Is there someone I can contact to sort that out?
[Bug fortran/77584] Unclassifiable statement error with procedure pointer using template named "structure_"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- You need to use your @gnu.gcc.org account to be able to modify BZs.
[Bug fortran/77584] Unclassifiable statement error with procedure pointer using template named "structure_"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584 --- Comment #8 from foreese at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #7) > You need to use your @gnu.gcc.org account to be able to modify BZs. Oh, thanks. Seems obvious now that I think about it. I didn't realize such an account was created for me.