[Bug fortran/82121] [7/8 Regression] Unclassifiable statement during compilation when assigning to a Character array in a derived type contained in a ASSOCIATE statement

2017-10-16 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82121

Paul Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas  ---
Fixed on trunk and 7-branch.

Thanks for the report.

Paul

[Bug fortran/82121] [7/8 Regression] Unclassifiable statement during compilation when assigning to a Character array in a derived type contained in a ASSOCIATE statement

2017-10-16 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82121

--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas  ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 16 19:44:04 2017
New Revision: 253794

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253794=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-10-16  Paul Thomas  

PR fortran/52832
* match.c (gfc_match_associate): Before failing the association
try again, allowing a proc pointer selector.

PR fortran/80120
PR fortran/81903
PR fortran/82121
* primary.c (gfc_match_varspec): Introduce 'tgt_expr', which
points to the associate selector, if any. Go through selector
references, after resolution for variables, to catch any full
or section array references. If a class associate name does
not have the same declared type as the selector, resolve the
selector and copy the declared type to the associate name.
Before throwing a no implicit type error, resolve all allowed
selector expressions, and copy the resulting typespec.

PR fortran/67543
* resolve.c (resolve_assoc_var): Selector must cannot be the
NULL expression and it must have a type.

PR fortran/78152
* resolve.c (resolve_symbol): Allow associate names to be
coarrays.

2017-10-16  Paul Thomas  

PR fortran/78512
* gfortran.dg/associate_9.f03 : Remove XFAIL.
* gfortran.dg/associate_26.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/80120
* gfortran.dg/associate_27.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/81903
* gfortran.dg/associate_28.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/82121
* gfortran.dg/associate_29.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/67543
* gfortran.dg/associate_30.f90 : New test.

Added:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_26.f90
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_27.f90
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_28.f90
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_29.f90
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_30.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/fortran/primary.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_9.f03

[Bug fortran/82121] [7/8 Regression] Unclassifiable statement during compilation when assigning to a Character array in a derived type contained in a ASSOCIATE statement

2017-09-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82121

--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas  ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 21 18:40:21 2017
New Revision: 253077

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253077=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-09-21  Paul Thomas  

PR fortran/52832
* match.c (gfc_match_associate): Before failing the association
try again, allowing a proc pointer selector.

PR fortran/80120
PR fortran/81903
PR fortran/82121
* primary.c (gfc_match_varspec): Introduce 'tgt_expr', which
points to the associate selector, if any. Go through selector
references, after resolution for variables, to catch any full
or section array references. If a class associate name does
not have the same declared type as the selector, resolve the
selector and copy the declared type to the associate name.
Before throwing a no implicit type error, resolve all allowed
selector expressions, and copy the resulting typespec.

PR fortran/67543
* resolve.c (resolve_assoc_var): Selector must cannot be the
NULL expression and it must have a type.

PR fortran/78152
* resolve.c (resolve_symbol): Allow associate names to be
coarrays.

2017-09-21  Paul Thomas  

PR fortran/78512
* gfortran.dg/associate_26.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/80120
* gfortran.dg/associate_27.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/81903
* gfortran.dg/associate_28.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/82121
* gfortran.dg/associate_29.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/67543
* gfortran.dg/associate_30.f90 : New test.

PR fortran/52832
* gfortran.dg/associate_31.f90 : New test.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_26.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_27.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_28.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_29.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_30.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_31.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/primary.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug fortran/82121] [7/8 Regression] Unclassifiable statement during compilation when assigning to a Character array in a derived type contained in a ASSOCIATE statement

2017-09-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82121

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
  Known to work||6.4.0
   Keywords||rejects-valid
   Last reconfirmed||2017-09-06
 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
Summary|Unclassifiable statement|[7/8 Regression]
   |during compilation when |Unclassifiable statement
   |assigning to a Character|during compilation when
   |array in a derived type |assigning to a Character
   |contained in a ASSOCIATE|array in a derived type
   |statement   |contained in a ASSOCIATE
   ||statement
  Known to fail||7.2.0, 8.0

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
Confirmed, likely r241860 (pr64933).