[Bug fortran/85357] ICE on invalid code with equal procedure names
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85357 --- Comment #10 from c...@mnet-mail.de --- Thanks for the fix, and a Happy New Year to you guys!
[Bug fortran/85357] ICE on invalid code with equal procedure names
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85357 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |9.0 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Having reviewed the audit trail, I agree with Janus' assessment with regard to the invalid code. The reported ICE is gone on branch-7, branch-8, and trunk. I have converted his code in comment #7 to a testcase and committed it to trunk to ensure that the ICE does not return.
[Bug fortran/85357] ICE on invalid code with equal procedure names
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85357 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Dec 26 21:08:53 2018 New Revision: 267423 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267423&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-12-26 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/85357 * gfortran.df/pr85357.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr85357.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug fortran/85357] ICE on invalid code with equal procedure names
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85357 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Further reduced test case for the ICE: module base implicit none contains subroutine summation(i) integer, intent(in) :: i end subroutine end module module extended use base implicit none contains subroutine summation() end subroutine end module