[Bug fortran/87575] [9 Regression] compilation error for 465.tonto SPEC benchmark since r264990

2018-10-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87575

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
Dup.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87577 ***

[Bug fortran/87575] [9 Regression] compilation error for 465.tonto SPEC benchmark since r264990

2018-10-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87575

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
If standard Fortran doesn't permit it, it should be allowed at least as an
extension and only complained about in pedantic modes.  And Fortran standard
should be better changed to allow it.

[Bug fortran/87575] [9 Regression] compilation error for 465.tonto SPEC benchmark since r264990

2018-10-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87575

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener  ---
just confirmed... :/

[Bug fortran/87575] [9 Regression] compilation error for 465.tonto SPEC benchmark since r264990

2018-10-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87575

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed||2018-10-10
  Known to work||8.2.0
 Blocks||26163
   Target Milestone|--- |9.0
  Known to fail||9.0


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
[Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)