[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on all open branches. Closing. Thanks for the report!
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2db200ea8a63dd580b47002d9464afc7a7b5e90e commit r10-11208-g2db200ea8a63dd580b47002d9464afc7a7b5e90e Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Mon Feb 6 20:59:51 2023 +0100 Fortran: ASSOCIATE variables should not be TREE_STATIC [PR95107] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/95107 * trans-decl.c (gfc_finish_var_decl): With -fno-automatic, do not make ASSOCIATE variables TREE_STATIC. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/95107 * gfortran.dg/save_7.f90: New test. (cherry picked from commit c36f3da534e7f411c5bc48c5b6b660e238167480)
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4eba6812c5652005e0e9dc62358a6fb3bda193e6 commit r11-10516-g4eba6812c5652005e0e9dc62358a6fb3bda193e6 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Mon Feb 6 20:59:51 2023 +0100 Fortran: ASSOCIATE variables should not be TREE_STATIC [PR95107] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/95107 * trans-decl.c (gfc_finish_var_decl): With -fno-automatic, do not make ASSOCIATE variables TREE_STATIC. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/95107 * gfortran.dg/save_7.f90: New test. (cherry picked from commit c36f3da534e7f411c5bc48c5b6b660e238167480)
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a5628b76380700198f64bf48f57081e6cfc39ed commit r12-9116-g6a5628b76380700198f64bf48f57081e6cfc39ed Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Mon Feb 6 20:59:51 2023 +0100 Fortran: ASSOCIATE variables should not be TREE_STATIC [PR95107] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/95107 * trans-decl.cc (gfc_finish_var_decl): With -fno-automatic, do not make ASSOCIATE variables TREE_STATIC. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/95107 * gfortran.dg/save_7.f90: New test. (cherry picked from commit c36f3da534e7f411c5bc48c5b6b660e238167480)
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c36f3da534e7f411c5bc48c5b6b660e238167480 commit r13-5732-gc36f3da534e7f411c5bc48c5b6b660e238167480 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Mon Feb 6 20:59:51 2023 +0100 Fortran: ASSOCIATE variables should not be TREE_STATIC [PR95107] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/95107 * trans-decl.cc (gfc_finish_var_decl): With -fno-automatic, do not make ASSOCIATE variables TREE_STATIC. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/95107 * gfortran.dg/save_7.f90: New test.
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-February/058891.html
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The issue can be studied by playing with option -fmax-stack-var-size=n. -fno-automatic corresponds to n=0; using n=64 and higher lets the code compile. There's something weird going on here.
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=92960 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- This is related to PR 92960, maybe even a dup.
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.3|10.4 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- GCC 10.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.4.
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > I ran into an ICE at that same line in that same file, but it was when > compiling a C source file instead of a Fortran one... should I open a > separate bug? actually never mind; the issue I was running into was actually bug 97125
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- I ran into an ICE at that same line in that same file, but it was when compiling a C source file instead of a Fortran one... should I open a separate bug?
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.2|10.3 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- GCC 10.2 is released, adjusting target milestone.
[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |ICE in hash_operand, at |hash_operand, at|fold-const.c:3768 |fold-const.c:3768 | --- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz --- > I see a Fortran FE ICE since at least 4.8.0: Can confirm that with test versions too.
