[Bug ipa/61820] 32-bit g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C execution failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61820 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- Sorry for missing the backport. I have done it now and so this should be fixed everywhere.
[Bug ipa/61820] 32-bit g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C execution failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61820 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed Jul 8 11:24:38 2015 New Revision: 225543 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225543&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C main return zero. 2015-07-08 Martin Jambor PR ipa/61820 Backport from mainline r212915 2014-07-22 Martin Jambor PR ipa/61160 * g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C (main): Return zero. Modified: branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C
[Bug ipa/61820] 32-bit g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C execution failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61820 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Richard PALO --- > I have this as well on SunOS 5.11 illumos with 4.9* (on pkgsrc) Right, the bug is still present on the 4.9 branch (only). It was fixed on mainline between r212903 and r212922, obviously by this patch (r212915) 2014-07-22 Martin Jambor PR ipa/61160 * g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C (main): Return zero. Rainer
[Bug ipa/61820] 32-bit g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C execution failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61820 Richard PALO changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard at netbsd dot org --- Comment #2 from Richard PALO --- I have this as well on SunOS 5.11 illumos with 4.9* (on pkgsrc)
[Bug ipa/61820] 32-bit g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C execution failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61820 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2014-07-16 CC||mjambor at suse dot cz Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Confirmed also on x86_64-apple-darwin13. The test fails since it has been added at revision r212071.