[Bug ipa/92550] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-8.c execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- Almost certainly started with new IPA-SRA (r275982 or as we now call it gcc-10-3311-gff6686d2e5f). I looked at dumps from a cross-compiler and the funny bit is, however, that new IPA-SRA simply does nothing. That is not as it should be. Because foo is not versionable, the pass does not even look at it and then cannot do anything because it has not seen a call to get_a. But of course it should still analyze outgoing calls to allow IPA-SRA of callees. But that is merely a missed optimization, not this miscompilation. I looks almost as if it was simply the expand of misaligned structure copy that is broken on (this?) strict-aliasing target. I also believe the test case does not successfuly run when compiled with earlier revisions and option -fno-ipa-sra.
[Bug ipa/92550] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-8.c execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC||law at redhat dot com
[Bug ipa/92550] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-8.c execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.2.1 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Revision 275550 was okay. Revision 276011 failed.
[Bug ipa/92550] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-8.c execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Summary|FAIL: |[10 Regression] FAIL: |gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-8.c |gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-8.c |execution test |execution test --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I suppose all these bugs are regressions (new FAILs)? If so can you please mark them so from the start? If they are not new testcases and GCC 9 works can you also set a known-to-work?
