[Bug java/18585] uniform passing of the classpath parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18585 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Closing as won't fix as the Java front-end has been removed from the trunk.
[Bug java/18585] uniform passing of the classpath parameter
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 17:16 --- All P1 enhancements not targeted towards 4.1, moving to P5. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18585
[Bug java/18585] uniform passing of the classpath parameter
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-21 00:02 --- Confirmed, related to PR 1374. -- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||1374 nThis|| Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-11-21 00:02:39 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18585
[Bug java/18585] uniform passing of the classpath parameter
--- Additional Comments From bojan at antonovic dot com 2004-11-21 01:16 --- Subject: Re: uniform passing of the classpath parameter pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-21 >00:02 --- >Confirmed, related to PR 1374. > > > Ok. But from Sun's side, their actual verions 1.4 and 1.5 are the benchmark, and they are the same for this little topic. Bojan -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18585
[Bug java/18585] uniform passing of the classpath parameter
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:32 --- The only missing option here is "gcj -cp foo". cvs head gcj accepts "-classpath foo" (not sure if 3.x did). gij accepts both short and long forms of options, and understands "-cp". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18585