[Bug libfortran/19071] complex formatted output has too many items
--- Additional Comments From bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 00:14 --- patch here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-12/msg00224.html -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19071
[Bug libfortran/19071] complex formatted output has too many items
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 00:29 --- Subject: Bug 19071 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-24 00:29:08 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io : transfer.c Added files: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: complex_write.f90 Log message: 2004-12-23 Bud Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/19071 * io/tranfer.c (formatted_transfer): moved check for format reversion inside the processing loop. * gfortran.dg/complex_write.f90: New test. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/complex_write.f90.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=NONEr2=1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4813r2=1.4814 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.140r2=1.141 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/transfer.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.22r2=1.23 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19071
[Bug libfortran/19071] complex formatted output has too many items
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 01:34 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19071
[Bug libfortran/19071] complex formatted output has too many items
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-20 16:10:36 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19071
[Bug libfortran/19071] complex formatted output has too many items
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2004-12-18 19:21 --- What I meant was that the bug is possibly related to PR 19064. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19071