[Bug libgomp/30546] [4.3 regression] build fail in libgomp because makeinfo is missing
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2007-01-27 00:37 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] build fail in libgomp because makeinfo is missing > Thus, two options present themself: ditch automake generated targets, do it > manually as everywhere else or tweak the Makefile.am to touch libgomp.info > before invoking `missing makeinfo`. > > Preferences? This only matters when building from SVN. I say we should just require makeinfo and forget about the problem. -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30546
Re: [Bug libgomp/30546] [4.3 regression] build fail in libgomp because makeinfo is missing
> Thus, two options present themself: ditch automake generated targets, do it > manually as everywhere else or tweak the Makefile.am to touch libgomp.info > before invoking `missing makeinfo`. > > Preferences? This only matters when building from SVN. I say we should just require makeinfo and forget about the problem. -- Pinski
[Bug libgomp/30546] [4.3 regression] build fail in libgomp because makeinfo is missing
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-27 00:34 --- As far as I can tell, the BUILD_INFO conditional can not easily be employed as the info, dvi and pdf targets are generated by automake. The `missing` program that is run instead should step into the breach. It does, but: gcc/missing, line 300-303: # If the file does not exist, the user really needs makeinfo; # let's fail without touching anything. test -f $file || exit 1 touch $file Thus, two options present themself: ditch automake generated targets, do it manually as everywhere else or tweak the Makefile.am to touch libgomp.info before invoking `missing makeinfo`. Preferences? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30546
[Bug libgomp/30546] [4.3 regression] build fail in libgomp because makeinfo is missing
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-27 00:08 --- My doings. I'll look into it. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2007-01-26 13:07:27 |2007-01-27 00:08:31 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30546
[Bug libgomp/30546] [4.3 regression] build fail in libgomp because makeinfo is missing
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 13:07 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The only other place that generates info files is gcc subdir and there it uses > BUILD_INFO conditional, if makeinfo is not present or is too old, it simply > doesn't build the documentation. Perhaps libgomp could do the same. Sounds a good plan. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-01-26 13:07:27 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30546
[Bug libgomp/30546] [4.3 regression] build fail in libgomp because makeinfo is missing
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 12:34 --- The only other place that generates info files is gcc subdir and there it uses BUILD_INFO conditional, if makeinfo is not present or is too old, it simply doesn't build the documentation. Perhaps libgomp could do the same. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30546
[Bug libgomp/30546] [4.3 regression] build fail in libgomp because makeinfo is missing
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 18:20 --- >From http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html Texinfo version 4.4 (or later) Necessary to build GCC documentation during development because the generated output files are not included in the SVN repository. They are included in releases. h, now building documentation != building gcc, I think -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30546