[Bug libstdc++/108327] [13 Regression] Lots of libstdc++ FAILs on powerpc64le-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108327 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed
[Bug libstdc++/108327] [13 Regression] Lots of libstdc++ FAILs on powerpc64le-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108327 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ceae3a66d3d9eb7c468f0a36f203c9e6b2b8a3e7 commit r13-5132-gceae3a66d3d9eb7c468f0a36f203c9e6b2b8a3e7 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Thu Jan 12 22:35:30 2023 + libstdc++: Fix exports for IEEE128 versions of __try_use_facet [PR108327] The new symbols need to be exported, as well as some of the std::locale::facet::id globals, which are not new but were presumably not needed by any inline functions before now. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/108327 * config/os/gnu-linux/ldbl-extra.ver (GLIBCXX_LDBL_3.4.31): Export __try_use_facet specializations for facets in namespace __gnu_cxx_ldbl128. * config/os/gnu-linux/ldbl-ieee128-extra.ver (GLIBCXX_IEEE128_3.4.31): Likewise for facets in namespace __gnu_cxx_ieee128. * testsuite/util/testsuite_abi.cc: Add to lists of known and latest versions.
[Bug libstdc++/108327] [13 Regression] Lots of libstdc++ FAILs on powerpc64le-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108327 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yes, I wrote: on --with-long-double-128 --with-long-double-format=ieee powerpc64le-linux. above. It was a Fedora package build actually: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/gcc/13.0.0/0.4.fc38/ and same happens in https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95815427 that is currently building.
[Bug libstdc++/108327] [13 Regression] Lots of libstdc++ FAILs on powerpc64le-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108327 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I assume this is with --with-long-double-format=ieee ? I don't see it when testing without that. I'm building with that option now and re-testing.
[Bug libstdc++/108327] [13 Regression] Lots of libstdc++ FAILs on powerpc64le-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108327 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2023-01-07 Ever confirmed|0 |1
[Bug libstdc++/108327] [13 Regression] Lots of libstdc++ FAILs on powerpc64le-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108327 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |13.0