[Bug libstdc++/18262] [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fails

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-09 
14:22 ---
So closing as works for me.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18262

[Bug libstdc++/18262] [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fails

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca]

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2004-11-01 
15:24 ---
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fa

 Dave, do you have time to work out what patch is causing the problem?  If
 not,
 please let me know, and I'll try to do it.

I don't have a lot of time at the moment, only evenings and weekends.

I found that the locale setup on the machine had likely changed.  The
system manager did some cleanups on it a couple of months ago and removed
some stuff needed by GCC.  I installed the debian locale package and
regenerated the locales needed for the v3 testsuite.  However, at first
crack this doesn't seem to have changed the situation.  I had built 3.4.2
last night and it now shows the same 16 fails.  Thus, it doesn't look like
a GCC patch is the cause of the regressions.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18262

[Bug libstdc++/18262] [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fails

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-01 02:46 
---
The only locale change for the gnu one was:
2004-10-10  Paolo Carlini  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* config/locale/gnu/monetary_members.cc (_S_construct_pattern):
Give __ret a default value, thus avoiding spurious warnings.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[3.4.3 Regression] New  |[3.4 Regression] New
   |libstdc++ testsuite fails   |libstdc++ testsuite fails
   Target Milestone|--- |3.4.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18262

[Bug libstdc++/18262] [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fails

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail||3.4.3 4.0.0
  Known to work||3.4.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18262

[Bug libstdc++/18262] [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fails

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail|3.4.3 4.0.0 |3.4.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18262

[Bug libstdc++/18262] [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fails

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca]

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2004-11-01 
03:08 ---
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fa

What|Removed |Added
 
   Known to fail|3.4.3 4.0.0 |3.4.3

Yes, this is in some way specific to 3.4.3.  The test results on
4.0.0 on this system are:

=== libstdc++ tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc execution test
XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ext/concept_checks.cc (test for excess errors)
WARNING: ext/concept_checks.cc compilation failed to produce executable

=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes3053
# of unexpected failures1
# of unexpected successes   2
# of expected failures  5

Compiler version: 4.0.0 20041028 (experimental) 
Platform: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

These results are with a LD_LIBRARY_PATH patch that I have been testing.
It's possible that the fails are a configuration issue.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18262

[Bug libstdc++/18262] [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fails

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-01 04:49 
---
Dave, do you have time to work out what patch is causing the problem?  If not,
please let me know, and I'll try to do it.

Thanks,

-- Mark

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18262