[Bug libstdc++/40606] Inside new_handler "throw;" operator may cause abort

2009-07-01 Thread tsyvarev at ispras dot ru


--- Comment #7 from tsyvarev at ispras dot ru  2009-07-02 06:16 ---
gcc --version gets:

gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291]

Yes, problem very probably target dependent - as I said, test suite was
executed on many other machines, including IA64 arhictecures with other
OSes(even SLES10) and SLES11 on other architectures(even on x86_64). But
problem have arisen only on SLES11[IA64].


-- 

tsyvarev at ispras dot ru changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 GCC target triplet||ia64-suse-linux


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40606



[Bug libstdc++/40606] Inside new_handler "throw;" operator may cause abort

2009-07-01 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com


--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-07-01 14:57 
---
... and very probably target dependent, I can't reproduce on x86_64-linux.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40606



[Bug libstdc++/40606] Inside new_handler "throw;" operator may cause abort

2009-07-01 Thread tsyvarev at ispras dot ru


--- Comment #5 from tsyvarev at ispras dot ru  2009-07-01 14:56 ---
Sorry, forgot about gcc version. I will post it not long after.

As for core C++ or libstdcxx problem - I don't know because couldn't localize
problem yet. Probably, this core C++ issue.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40606



[Bug libstdc++/40606] Inside new_handler "throw;" operator may cause abort

2009-07-01 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com


--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-07-01 14:19 
---
On x86_64, I can't reproduce either 4_3-branch, 4_4-branch or mainline. I would
suggest you to double check if the problem happens also with an official GNU
release (not Novell' SLES) and, in case it does, mark the PR as target, if not
report to Novell. Thanks.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40606



[Bug libstdc++/40606] Inside new_handler "throw;" operator may cause abort

2009-07-01 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com


--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-07-01 14:09 
---
gcc version, please.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40606



[Bug libstdc++/40606] Inside new_handler "throw;" operator may cause abort

2009-07-01 Thread tsyvarev at ispras dot ru


--- Comment #2 from tsyvarev at ispras dot ru  2009-07-01 13:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=18108)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18108&action=view)
reproduce problem

g++ -O2 test.cpp && ./a.out

Executing test_4_10()
Aborted

Exit code is 134.

Unfortunately, there is no reasonable backtrace, as the error is reported via 
abort() and the stack only shows the abort() call.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40606



[Bug libstdc++/40606] Inside new_handler "throw;" operator may cause abort

2009-07-01 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com


--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-07-01 13:52 
---
Attachment missing. Also, please dougle check this is not a core C++ proper
issue.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40606