[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21 16:26:11 UTC --- Well, issue seems to be related to TLS-code of runtime you were using. With more up-to-date runtime-version this is fixed for all mingw-flavors. Additionally 4.5.x branch has reached already end of support, so I close this as works-for-me
[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 Pierre Ossman ossman at cendio dot se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ossman at cendio dot se --- Comment #4 from Pierre Ossman ossman at cendio dot se 2011-12-19 10:11:18 UTC --- Well that was a bit rude. If this bug only appears under certain circumstances, then shouldn't we try to find those circumstances rather than just saying that if gcc works on your machine then that's good enough?
[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 --- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 10:23:51 UTC --- Well, I wouldn't say that this was rude. The issue here is most likely, that the runtime DLLs by gcc aren't in search-path when you are trying to execute your built application. But this isn't a subject of gcc itself. I see that you have this issue, but user-support questions on how to setup environment for built applications, or what is necessary to provide along-side built-application so that they run, is more something related to gcc's user ML, or even better to ask directly for it on mingw.org's or mingw-w64's public user-mailing lists. On those later lists you can be sure that you will find a solution for your issue.
[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 Peter Åstrand astrand at cendio dot se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #6 from Peter Åstrand astrand at cendio dot se 2011-12-19 12:23:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Well, I wouldn't say that this was rude. The issue here is most likely, that the runtime DLLs by gcc aren't in search-path when you are trying to execute your built application. This is not how Windows works. If the DLLs aren't found, the application isn't started at all. But in this case, the binaries do start, but immediately crashes. Thus, this cannot be an installation problem. It's of course possible that our *build* of GCC is different in some way that triggers this bug. But something is clearly wrong here, and as I mentioned in the original report, 4.4.3 worked fine. We are working a Subversion based build environment, and our build of 4.5.2 is therefore done in exactly the same way as 4.4.3, which worked. We did however upgrade binutils from 2.20 to 2.21 in the same step. We also migrated our thread fixes. I will attach both patches. Can you reproduce the problem if you are using the same settings as we?
[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 --- Comment #7 from Peter Åstrand astrand at cendio dot se 2011-12-19 12:24:44 UTC --- Created attachment 26141 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26141 gcc-4.4.3-threads.patch
[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 --- Comment #8 from Peter Åstrand astrand at cendio dot se 2011-12-19 12:25:13 UTC --- Created attachment 26142 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26142 gcc-4.5.2-threads.patch
[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17 16:07:24 UTC --- No idea. I've tested this on my box (for 4.5.x and for 4.6.x) and don't get this failure at all. Shared version works as good as the static one. So I assume that here something is broken with toolchain-build, or PATH environment is setuped wrong. Anyway I can't confirm this issue. So I would suggest to close this issue as WORKSFORME.
[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-17 16:33:06 UTC --- Thanks. Let's do that.
[Bug libstdc++/48881] Dynamic link to libstdc++-6.dll / libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll produces broken binaries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.korn.cygwin at gmail ||dot com, ktietz at gcc dot ||gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-25 09:51:37 UTC --- Kai, Dave, can you have a look?
