[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 __vic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #13 from __vic 2012-06-15 08:51:36 UTC --- NSDMI works fine. Thanx
[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-05 13:33:38 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Nov 5 13:33:29 2011 New Revision: 181013 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181013 Log: PR libstdc++/49894 PR bootstrap/50982 * include/std/mutex (once_flag): Use NSDMI. Modified: trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/std/mutex
[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-24 23:29:38 UTC --- Fixed for 4.7 - mutexes and condition_variables use NSDMI to initialize the native types when possible
[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-24 23:26:29 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Mon Oct 24 23:26:25 2011 New Revision: 180411 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180411 Log: PR libstdc++/49894 * include/std/mutex (__mutex_base,__recursive_mutex_base): Define new base classes to manage construction/destruction of native mutexes, using NSDMI when INIT macros are defined. (mutex,recursive_mutex,timed_mutex,recursive_timed_mutex): Derive from new base classes. * include/std/condition_variable (condition_variable): Use NSDMI when INIT macro is defined. Use noexcept. * src/condition_variable.cc (condition_variable): Explicitly-default constructor/destructor when using NSDMI. Use noexcept. (condition_variable_any): Likewise. Modified: trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/std/condition_variable trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/std/mutex trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/condition_variable.cc
[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jwakely.gcc at gmail dot| |com | --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-15 19:53:22 UTC --- Indeed. Thanks a lot!
[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |redi at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-15 12:53:47 UTC --- I'll deal with this after PR 50196
[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-15 12:25:41 UTC --- Yeah, this pr inspired http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-10/msg00016.html
[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot ||com --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-14 23:04:27 UTC --- Jon, did you follow this?
[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-14
19:28:42 UTC ---
The request to support ({ ... }) for array mem-initializers was rejected by
core:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#1339
Now that the compiler supports non-static data member initializers, the library
should use that instead of a mem-initializer.
::pthread_cond_t cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
should work in all cases.
