[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-01-31
Summary|{float,double,long double} |[4.8 Regression]
|complex not accepted|{float,double,long double}
|anymore |complex not accepted
||anymore
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-31 12:31:18
UTC ---
Confirming as regression (doesn't mean it can't be marked wontfix later).
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-31 12:37:11 UTC --- Yeah, I think my preference would be to #undef complex at the beginning of , or ignore PR54112 altogether.
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-31 12:53:45 UTC --- Created attachment 29315 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29315 #undef complex only if is included Completely untested patch just to make comment #1 more clear.
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-31 12:57:46 UTC --- Just to confirm that I like this sort of change. Thanks Marc.
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-31 13:05:52 UTC --- Yeah, looks nice.
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-31 16:53:42 UTC --- Ok, I'll add a testcase and test the patch in a couple weeks if nobody beats me to it (I am leaving tonight).
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-31 16:59:52 UTC --- Great, thanks.
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-09 18:42:48 UTC --- Given this is now P1, could the #c9 patch be committed soon, and perhaps just defer a testcase for it when Marc returns?
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot ||com --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-12 16:53:42 UTC --- Marc, any news on this?
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-12 16:59:39 UTC --- Jakub, if Marc remains unreachable I'll take care of carefully checking and committing the patch in #c9 first thing tomorrow.
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse 2013-02-12 20:55:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Marc, any news on this? I landed less than 2 hours ago... I'll see if I can handle it tomorrow.
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #18 from Marc Glisse 2013-02-13
21:58:57 UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Wed Feb 13 21:58:53 2013
New Revision: 196034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196034
Log:
2013-02-13 Marc Glisse
PR libstdc++/56111
* include/std/complex (complex): Undefine.
* include/c_compatibility/complex.h (complex): Only undefine if
has been included.
* testsuite/26_numerics/complex/56111.cc: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/56111.cc (with props)
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/c_compatibility/complex.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/std/complex
Propchange: trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/56111.cc
('svn:eol-style' added)
Propchange: trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/56111.cc
('svn:keywords' added)
[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |glisse at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #19 from Marc Glisse 2013-02-13 22:02:33 UTC --- Done. Users should still convert their code to use _Complex instead if they want it to work in C++11.
