[Bug libstdc++/77691] [10/11/12/13 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 --- Comment #57 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f629f63d2d9d7ad2c43f8e451f0f6e32b5f4d06a commit r13-5127-gf629f63d2d9d7ad2c43f8e451f0f6e32b5f4d06a Author: Jonathan Wakely Date: Thu Jan 12 10:58:13 2023 + libstdc++: Extend max_align_t special case to 64-bit HP-UX [PR77691] GCC's std::max_align_t doesn't agree with the system malloc on HP-UX, so generalize the current hack for Solaris to apply to that target too. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/77691 * include/experimental/memory_resource (_GLIBCXX_MAX_ALIGN_MATCHES_MALLOC): Define. (do_allocate, do_deallocate): Check it. * testsuite/experimental/memory_resource/new_delete_resource.cc: Relax expected behaviour for 64-bit hppa-hp-hpux11.11.
[Bug libstdc++/77691] [10/11/12/13 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 --- Comment #56 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2023-01-09 6:20 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Maybe like this. Actually, the change i sent was for libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/memory_resource/new_delete_resource.cc. It still fails. No objection to the approach.
[Bug libstdc++/77691] [10/11/12/13 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 --- Comment #55 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 54215 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54215&action=edit Generalise special case for malloc not afreeing with max_align_t I think we also want to fix the actual code to meet the guarantee, not just relax the test. Maybe like this.
[Bug libstdc++/77691] [10/11/12/13 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 --- Comment #54 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 54213 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54213&action=edit Patch to fix test failure on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
[Bug libstdc++/77691] [10/11/12/13 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-09-22 00:00:00 |2023-1-5 --- Comment #53 from John David Anglin --- Still fails on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
[Bug libstdc++/77691] [10/11/12/13 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #52 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
[Bug libstdc++/77691] [10/11/12/13 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4 --- Comment #51 from Richard Biener --- GCC 9 branch is being closed
