[Bug libstdc++/99985] [9/10/11 Regression] bits/hashtable.h:483:9: error: body of ‘constexpr’ function ... not a return-statement since g:1cbba49e3417d9b0661e70301d6fb7a7f52fd360

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99985

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Should be fixed everywhere.

[Bug libstdc++/99985] [9/10/11 Regression] bits/hashtable.h:483:9: error: body of ‘constexpr’ function ... not a return-statement since g:1cbba49e3417d9b0661e70301d6fb7a7f52fd360

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99985

--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits  ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b66d162835621c81a78f361416149d914d31de8

commit r9-9335-g6b66d162835621c81a78f361416149d914d31de8
Author: Jonathan Wakely 
Date:   Fri Apr 9 12:05:39 2021 +0100

libstdc++: Fix invalid constexpr function in C++11 mode [PR 99985]

I keep forgetting that a constexpr function in C++11 has to be a single
return statement.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

PR libstdc++/99985
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable::_S_nothrow_move()): Fix
to be a valid constexpr function in C++11.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/99985.cc: New test.

(cherry picked from commit 40ccb47b505b528244ee305923681c0ae3b6f4d5)

[Bug libstdc++/99985] [9/10/11 Regression] bits/hashtable.h:483:9: error: body of ‘constexpr’ function ... not a return-statement since g:1cbba49e3417d9b0661e70301d6fb7a7f52fd360

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99985

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits  ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:637418ec2c6f559d4fac074db3bafc34a728484b

commit r10-9679-g637418ec2c6f559d4fac074db3bafc34a728484b
Author: Jonathan Wakely 
Date:   Fri Apr 9 12:05:39 2021 +0100

libstdc++: Fix invalid constexpr function in C++11 mode [PR 99985]

I keep forgetting that a constexpr function in C++11 has to be a single
return statement.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

PR libstdc++/99985
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable::_S_nothrow_move()): Fix
to be a valid constexpr function in C++11.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/99985.cc: New test.

(cherry picked from commit 40ccb47b505b528244ee305923681c0ae3b6f4d5)

[Bug libstdc++/99985] [9/10/11 Regression] bits/hashtable.h:483:9: error: body of ‘constexpr’ function ... not a return-statement since g:1cbba49e3417d9b0661e70301d6fb7a7f52fd360

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99985

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40ccb47b505b528244ee305923681c0ae3b6f4d5

commit r11-8085-g40ccb47b505b528244ee305923681c0ae3b6f4d5
Author: Jonathan Wakely 
Date:   Fri Apr 9 12:05:39 2021 +0100

libstdc++: Fix invalid constexpr function in C++11 mode [PR 99985]

I keep forgetting that a constexpr function in C++11 has to be a single
return statement.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

PR libstdc++/99985
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable::_S_nothrow_move()): Fix
to be a valid constexpr function in C++11.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/99985.cc: New test.