[Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto

2014-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener  ---
Confirmed fixed.

[Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto

2014-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Bug 60424 depends on bug 60427, which changed state.

Bug 60427 Summary: [4.9 Regression] r208312 causes ICE and wrong code for 
Fortran with -flto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto

2014-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener  ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar  6 11:19:13 2014
New Revision: 208379

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-06  Richard Biener  

PR middle-end/60445
PR lto/60424
PR lto/60427
Revert
2014-03-04  Paulo Matos  

* tree-streamer.c (record_common_node): Assert we don't record
nodes with type double.
(preload_common_node): Skip type double, complex double and
double pointer since it is now frontend dependent due to
fshort-double option.

* gcc.dg/lto/pr55113_0.c: New testcase.

Removed:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr55113_0.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-streamer.c

[Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto

2014-03-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2014-03-06
 Depends on||60427
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener  ---
Looks related, yes.  Confirmed btw.

[Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto

2014-03-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Isn't this the same issue as PR60427?

[Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto

2014-03-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Everywhere.

[Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto

2014-03-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener  ---
Which architecture?

[Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto

2014-03-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Started to fail between r208309 and r208316.

[Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto

2014-03-05 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0