[Bug middle-end/111152] ~7-9% performance regression on 510.parest_r SPEC 2017 benchmark

[fkastl at suse dot cz via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52

Filip Kastl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #4 from Filip Kastl  ---
Marking as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 111064 ***

[Bug middle-end/111152] ~7-9% performance regression on 510.parest_r SPEC 2017 benchmark

[fkastl at suse dot cz via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52

--- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl  ---
Ah, sorry. Didn't notice I'm making a duplicate.

The Zen3 regression isn't that big and could just be noise.

[Bug middle-end/111152] ~7-9% performance regression on 510.parest_r SPEC 2017 benchmark

[crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52

--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu  ---
> With Zen3 -O2 generic lto pgo the regression is less noticeable (only 4%)
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=694.457.0

Not sure about this part

[Bug middle-end/111152] ~7-9% performance regression on 510.parest_r SPEC 2017 benchmark

[crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52

Hongtao.liu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||crazylht at gmail dot com

--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu  ---
It's PR111064