[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-03-11 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-11 23:53 
---
This is a regression from GCC 3.3.  I'm working on a patch.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-03-10 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-10 19:42 
---
Created an attachment (id=8373)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8373action=view)
smaller C test case

The test case provided by the submitter runs successfully if the executable is
built without -Wl,-E, as does the smaller C test case.  I understand that the
original program needs to use that option, so I'll continue looking  into this
to find a fix and perhaps a workaround.

The new test case fails with a plain make invocation for mainline,
4.0-branch,
and 3.4-branch, and passes for all of those with make EXP=.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
   |dot org |
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-03-10 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-11 01:32 
---
The submitter's testcase works if function __gcov_init in libgcov.c
is declared hidden.  Probably all of the __gcov* symbols ought to be
hidden; I'll work on a patch to hide that symbol and others that seem
appropriate.

Possible workaround:

The linker's -E option exports all global symbols from the executable
to the dynamic symbol table.  A subset of global symbols can be
exported by using -E along with --version-script to list symbols to
export.  Depending on how many symbols a shared object needs to access
from a shared object, this might be a reasonable workaround.
I consulted an expert, and unfortunatly there doesn't seem to be a way
to say export all symbols except this small list.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-03-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|normal
   Keywords|wrong-code  |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-03-07 Thread renierm at us dot ibm dot com

--- Additional Comments From renierm at us dot ibm dot com  2005-03-08 
03:59 ---
I am experiencing the same exact problem with our project   
http://openhpi.sf.net.   
gcov_exit() segfaults when the project is compiled with -fprofile-arcs and   
-ftest-coverage using gcc-3.4.x, and unit tests are ran against the compiled   
library.  
This is a real and preoccupying problem for us on gcc-3.4.x.  

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-28 Thread lothar at xcerla dot com

--- Additional Comments From lothar at xcerla dot com  2005-03-01 01:03 
---
Changed severity to critical, as the compiler produces code that crashes when  
executing a coverage enabled executable. 
  

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |critical


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-01 
01:15 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 Changed severity to critical, as the compiler produces code that crashes when 
  
 executing a coverage enabled executable. 

Well considering this is werid case of using arc profiling with shared 
libraries it is not critical and has a 
workaround, not unloading the shared library.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|normal


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-28 Thread lothar at xcerla dot com

--- Additional Comments From lothar at xcerla dot com  2005-03-01 01:23 
---
A bug that creates wrong code is critical for me.   
   
As our application depends on dynamically loading libraries, there's simply NO  
 
workaround for this bug.   
We can NOT execute any executables built with code coverage with either 3.4.1   
or 4.0.0.   
   
I am really worried that 4.0.0 may get released without fully working code   
coverage.   
   
P.S.   
I tried to mark the bug as waiting for feedback, but it said I do not have  
the permissions. Am I not the owner of the bug?  
If possible mark the bug as waiting for feedback and the Target Milestone to 
4.0.0. Thanks 
 

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |critical
   Keywords||wrong-code
  Known to fail||3.4.1 4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
  Component|c++ |middle-end


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-15 Thread lothar at xcerla dot com

--- Additional Comments From lothar at xcerla dot com  2005-02-15 21:46 
---
Created an attachment (id=8201)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8201action=view)
test case to reproduce the segfault

This is a project of a small test case that reproduces the segmentation fault.
It's build tool is SCons. If you don not want to use SCons, here's the command
line(s) executed:

/opt2/GNU/bin/g++-3.4.1 -O0 -g -D_REENTRANT -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-Wno-uninitialized -Woverloaded-virtual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wcomments
-march=pentiumpro -DCOVERAGE -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -Isrc -c -o
src/prog/.build/posix/coverage/main.o src/prog/main.cpp
/opt2/GNU/bin/g++-3.4.1 -g -Wl,-E -o bin/posix/coverage/prog
src/prog/.build/posix/coverage/main.o -Llib/posix/coverage -lstdc++ -lpthread
-lrt -ldl -lgcov
/opt2/GNU/bin/g++-3.4.1 -O0 -g -D_REENTRANT -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-Wno-uninitialized -Woverloaded-virtual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wcomments
-march=pentiumpro -DCOVERAGE -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fPIC -Isrc -c -o
src/calc/.build/posix/coverage/calc.os src/calc/calc.cpp
/opt2/GNU/bin/g++-3.4.1 -g -Wl,-E -Wl,-soname=libcalc.so.1.0 -shared -o
lib/posix/coverage/libcalc.so src/calc/.build/posix/coverage/calc.os
-Llib/posix/coverage -lstdc++ -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lgcov


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985


[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-15 
21:55 ---
Hmm, this looks like we don't deal with dlclose correctly.

Honza could you comment on this if there is a way to deal with dlclose?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985