[Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-22 14:04 --- What about using PATH_MAX which is part of the POSIX standard? -- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Component|c |middle-end Keywords||build Priority|P1 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706
[Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-05-22 15:35 --- Subject: Re: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | What about using PATH_MAX which is part of the POSIX standard? I think the point was about arbitray limit; and as far as I can tell GNU does not claim to be POSIX, does it? ;-) -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706
[Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-05-22 15:36 --- Like most POSIX limits PATH_MAX may not be defined if the actual limit is not fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706
[Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
--- Additional Comments From ams at gnu dot org 2005-05-26 12:59 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Like most POSIX limits PATH_MAX may not be defined if the actual limit is not > > fixed. Correct, and GNU doesn't have such a limit for the length of filenames, the number of arguments passed to a program or the length of a hostname. And probobly a whole bunch of other things that have slipped my mind right now. All of this is perfectly compliant with POSIX. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706
[Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||21824 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706
[Bug middle-end/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:00 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-06-19 14:00:56 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706