[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

[uttamp at us dot ibm dot com]

--- Comment #8 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com  2006-01-04 16:50 ---
This has been fixed with todays mainline tree.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

[uttamp at us dot ibm dot com]

--- Comment #9 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com  2006-01-04 16:51 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25578 ***


-- 

uttamp at us dot ibm dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-04 01:23 ---
Hmm, this seems to work on Diego's tester on powerpc64-linux-gnu:
http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000.ppc64/gcc/log/20060103/CFP2000.084.html

What options are you using?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-04 01:27 ---
And SuSE's tester:
http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/SPEC/CFP/sb-vangelis-head-64/recent.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

[uttamp at us dot ibm dot com]

--- Comment #3 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com  2006-01-04 01:46 ---
peak options are,
-O3 -mcpu=power4 -ffast-math -ftree-loop-linear -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops
-m32

base options are,
-O2 -mcpu=power4 -m32


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-04 01:46 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 And SuSE's tester:
 http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/SPEC/CFP/sb-vangelis-head-64/recent.html

Oh, that is a x86_64, SuSE's ppc64 tester looks to be down.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-04 01:49 ---
I wonder if this is related at all to PR 25578 which was just fixed today:
2006-01-03  Paolo Bonzini  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR rtl-optimization/25578
* combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx, force_to_mode): Don't
pass a parameter to simplify_shift_const if changing ASHIFTRT
to LSHIFTRT.

As both sixtrack and fma3d are fortran programs.  Can you try after that patch
and if it works, the please close this and fma3d's bug as a dup of PR 25578?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-04 01:52 ---
Oh, I forgot to mention that the patch which caused PR 25578 was:
2005-12-23  Paolo Bonzini  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

[uttamp at us dot ibm dot com]

--- Comment #7 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com  2006-01-04 02:02 ---
Yes, I'll.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657