[Bug middle-end/30696] [4.3 regression] Linker failure with OpenMP and inline function

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-08 23:35 ---
Fixed on the trunk, thanks.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30696

[Bug middle-end/30696] [4.3 regression] Linker failure with OpenMP and inline function

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-04 23:41 ---
Subject: Bug 30696

Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Feb  4 23:40:58 2007
New Revision: 121582

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121582
Log:
PR middle-end/30696
* ipa-inline.c (cgraph_clone_inlined_nodes): When there are unanalyzed
nodes in cgraph, don't remove offline copy of the function.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ipa-inline.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30696

[Bug middle-end/30696] [4.3 regression] Linker failure with OpenMP and inline function

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-03 23:32 ---
Confirmed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-02-03 23:32:58
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30696

[Bug middle-end/30696] [4.3 regression] Linker failure with OpenMP and inline function

[reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-03 21:39 
---
Even shorter testcase:


inline void foo() {}

int main()
{
#pragma omp parallel
foo();
foo();

return 0;
}



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30696

[Bug middle-end/30696] [4.3 regression] Linker failure with OpenMP and inline function

[reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30696