[Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements

2010-10-25 Thread siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820

--- Comment #8 from Siarhei Siamashka  
2010-10-25 10:17:47 UTC ---
On the second thought, this bug was about global variables. But my problem is
related to the use of local variables. So I have submitted a separate PR46164
about it.

[Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements

2010-10-11 Thread siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820

Siarhei Siamashka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||siarhei.siamashka at gmail
   ||dot com

--- Comment #7 from Siarhei Siamashka  
2010-10-11 19:18:46 UTC ---
Looks like this or similar "Variables in Specified Registers" bug is also
reproducible on ARM with gcc 4.5.1

$ cat test.c

int f(int a)
{
  register int result asm("r0");
  asm (
"addr0, %[a], #123\n"
: [result] "=&r" (result)
: [a]  "r"   (a)
  );
  return result;
}

$ gcc -O2 -c test.c
$ objdump -d test.o

 :
   0:   e280007badd r0, r0, #123; 0x7b
   4:   e1a3mov r0, r3
   8:   e12fff1ebx  lr

Here the local variable 'result' gets assigned to register r3 instead of r0
causing all kind of problems.

[Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements

2009-02-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-04 04:24 ---
I tried the testcase with 4.4.0.  The problem is not fixed.  All the explicit
register variables are optimized away at -O.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820

[Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements

2007-11-26 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-26 14:10 ---
Thanks for the effort you have put into this.

Your bug is probably fixed in GCC 4.3 (for which the entire dataflow module has
been rewritten from scratch) but it probably still exists in GCC 4.2.

As you have shown, the bug exists since GCC 3.0, so the bug is not a
regression.  GCC 4.2 and earlier are in "regression fixes only" mode.  This
means, I'm sorry to say, that your bug will not be fixed for these already
released GCC versions.

Could you please test this bug with a recent GCC 4.3 snapshot?  If the bug
persists, we can still fix the problem before GCC 4.3 is released.


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820

[Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements

2007-08-09 Thread jbuehler at spirentcom dot com 


--- Comment #4 from jbuehler at spirentcom dot com  2007-08-09 11:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=14045)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14045&action=view)
gcc 4.0.4 global register variable optimizer patch

The attached patch fixes the optimizer bug for gcc 4.0.4 and allows GHC 6.6.1
to be compiled with optimization turned on.  The problem is that lifetime
analysis is marking global registers as REG_UNUSED and then the combiner pass
is eliminating them.  The fix is to not mark global registers as unused.

The fix is based on a review of the flow.c code for gcc 4.2.0.  Code was added
to flow.c somewhere after 4.0.4 to handle "stack registers" and no mark them as
REG_UNUSED.  This patch merely mimics "stack register" handling in flow.c for
global registers.

I am not a gcc expert and make no claims for the correctness of this patch --
it does fix my ghc compile though.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820

[Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements

2007-07-25 Thread jbuehler at spirentcom dot com 


--- Comment #3 from jbuehler at spirentcom dot com  2007-07-25 13:28 ---
I would appreciate a fix for this because the code being compiled is the GHC
compiler itself.  I have to compile GHC for hppa without optimization because I
have been unable to find a compiler options workaround for this problem.  The
unoptimized GHC has a 40 megabyte text section and I am hoping for significant
speed improvements once the optimizer is usable.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820

[Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements

2007-07-25 Thread jbuehler at spirentcom dot com 


--- Comment #2 from jbuehler at spirentcom dot com  2007-07-25 13:22 ---
The same bug is present in the following versions of gcc for
sparc-sun-solaris2.9:

2.95.3
2.95
3.0.2
3.0.4
3.1.1
3.2.3
3.3.6
3.4.6
4.0.1
4.0.4
4.1.2
4.2.0

Use registers l1, l2, l3, l4 in the sample code to demonstrate the problem.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820

[Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements

2007-07-25 Thread jbuehler at spirentcom dot com 


--- Comment #1 from jbuehler at spirentcom dot com  2007-07-25 13:09 ---
This bug is also present in 4.0.1 for powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0.  Change the
registers in the problematic code to r14, r15, r16, r17 -- one of the registers
is not set by the optimized routine, but is by the non-optimized routine.  I
presume that this is not a target-specific bug.


-- 

jbuehler at spirentcom dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jbuehler at spirentcom dot
   ||com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820