[Bug middle-end/38219] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c fails on m68k

2016-11-17 Thread law at redhat dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||law at redhat dot com
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law  ---
Fixed on the trunk.

[Bug middle-end/38219] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c fails on m68k

2016-11-17 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219

--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law  ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Nov 17 23:54:46 2016
New Revision: 242576

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242576=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/38219
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c: Do not run on m68k.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c

[Bug middle-end/38219] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c fails on m68k

2016-01-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|powerpc*-*-*|m68k-*-linux-gnu,
   ||powerpc*-*-*
   Last reconfirmed|2013-12-27 00:00:00 |2016-1-29
 CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #18 from Martin Sebor  ---
For powerpc, I only see the failures in 4.8.5 and 4.9.{3,4} results:
/home/msebor/Documents/GCC/testresults/2016-01/msg02767.html

They are present in m68k-unknown-linux-gnu results for 6.0 so I added it to the
list of targets:
/home/msebor/Documents/GCC/testresults/2016-01/msg02733.html

[Bug middle-end/38219] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c fails on m68k

2014-07-10 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219

Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
Summary|gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c |gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c
   |fails on powerpc|fails on m68k

--- Comment #17 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This test no longer fails on powerpc after my patch to make powerpc*-*-* a
logical_op_short_circuit target
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg00637.html).

Searching the test-results, looks like m68k is the only other target where it's
still failing(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-07/msg00700.html).
More than likely for the same reason since it looks like that target doesn't
define LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT or BRANCH_COST, which means it should
default to false.