[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 14:08 --- On trunk I get: foo: subl$44, %esp movl48(%esp), %eax movaps (%eax), %xmm0 leal16(%esp), %eax movl%eax, (%esp) movaps %xmm0, 16(%esp) callbar addl$44, %esp ret thus, fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work||4.5.0 Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-20 01:05 --- *** Bug 43124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kai dot germaschewski at ||gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-31 16:58 --- Subject: Bug 39315 Author: hjl Date: Sat Oct 31 16:58:17 2009 New Revision: 153780 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153780 Log: gcc/ 2009-10-31 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com Backport from mainline: 2009-03-27 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR middle-end/39315 * cfgexpand.c (expand_one_stack_var_at): Change alignment limit to MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT. gcc/testsuite/ 2009-10-31 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com Backport from mainline: 2009-03-27 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR middle-end/39315 * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-1.c: New. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-2.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-3.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-4.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-check.c: Likewise. Added: branches/ix86/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-1.c branches/ix86/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-2.c branches/ix86/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-3.c branches/ix86/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-4.c branches/ix86/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-check.c Modified: branches/ix86/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/ChangeLog.ix86 branches/ix86/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/cfgexpand.c branches/ix86/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.ix86 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-23 13:43 --- *** Bug 40838 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikulas at artax dot karlin ||dot mff dot cuni dot cz http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 18:33 --- Stop setting the target milestone unless it is a regression. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.5.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-27 22:37 --- Subject: Bug 39315 Author: hjl Date: Fri Mar 27 22:37:39 2009 New Revision: 145138 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145138 Log: gcc/ 2009-03-27 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR middle-end/39315 * cfgexpand.c (expand_one_stack_var_at): Change alignment limit to MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT. gcc/testsuite/ 2009-03-27 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR middle-end/39315 * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-1.c: New. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-2.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-3.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-4.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-check.c: Likewise. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-3.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-4.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-check.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cfgexpand.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-28 18:41 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-02/msg01267.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- ||patches/2009- ||02/msg01267.html http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-28 18:55 --- Subject: Bug 39315 Author: hjl Date: Sat Feb 28 18:55:06 2009 New Revision: 144492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=144492 Log: gcc/ 2009-02-28 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR middle-end/39315 * cfgexpand.c (expand_one_stack_var_at): Change alignment limit to MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT. gcc/testsuite/ 2009-02-28 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR middle-end/39315 * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-1.c: New. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-2.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-3.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-4.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr39315-check.c: Likewise. Added: branches/stack/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-1.c branches/stack/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-2.c branches/stack/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-3.c branches/stack/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-4.c branches/stack/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39315-check.c Modified: branches/stack/gcc/ChangeLog.stackalign branches/stack/gcc/cfgexpand.c branches/stack/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.stackalign -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-28 00:03 --- Created an attachment (id=17373) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17373action=view) A new patch This patch may work better. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17368|0 |1 is obsolete|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-28 02:03 --- Created an attachment (id=17375) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17375action=view) An updated patch When align == 0, we should align variable to STACK_BOUNDARY. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-26 17:01 --- Gcc 4.3 generates aligned move since it doesn't check the alignment attribute. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-26 17:13 --- Created an attachment (id=17368) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17368action=view) A patch Does this patch make sense? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #3 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2009-02-27 02:53 --- (In reply to comment #2) Created an attachment (id=17368) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17368action=view) [edit] A patch Does this patch make sense? It works fine. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315
[Bug middle-end/39315] Unaligned move used on aligned stack variable
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-27 03:37 --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Created an attachment (id=17368) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17368action=view) [edit] A patch Does this patch make sense? It works fine. It failed for me in libgcc during bootstrap on Linux/ia32. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39315