[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|matz at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-14 11:47:55 UTC --- I will look at backporting the 4.6 variant.
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3 --- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-16 13:03:16 UTC --- GCC 4.5.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592 --- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17 11:31:14 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jan 17 11:31:10 2011 New Revision: 168894 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168894 Log: 2011-01-17 Richard Guenther Backport from mainline PR tree-optimization/47286 * tree-ssa-structalias.c (new_var_info): Register variables are global. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr47286.c: New testcase. PR tree-optimization/44592 * tree-ssa-ccp.c (gimplify_and_update_call_from_tree): Copy from trunk. * gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90: New testcase. Added: branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr47286.c branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work||4.5.3, 4.6.0 Resolution||FIXED Known to fail||4.5.2 --- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17 11:34:31 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:29 --- GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.5.1 |4.5.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-10 19:36:15 UTC --- What are the plans with is pr? Will it be back-ported to 4.5?
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-10-10 20:03:30 UTC --- On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592 > > --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres > 2010-10-10 19:36:15 UTC --- > What are the plans with is pr? Will it be back-ported to 4.5? There were various fallouts of the fix, including one fixed only last week. But yes, a backport might eventually happen
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
--- Comment #6 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-28 15:16 --- Fixed for 4.6, waiting a bit for 4.5. -- matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong |[4.5 Regression] wrong code |code at -O3 |at -O3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-06-28 20:42 --- > Fixed for 4.6, waiting a bit for 4.5. Revision 161496 caused pr44699. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-01 12:16 --- > > Fixed for 4.6, waiting a bit for 4.5. > > Revision 161496 caused pr44699. I think the PRINTs are of no use in the testsuite for gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90. I'ld suggest to apply the following patch: --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90 2010-06-28 17:51:41.0 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90 2010-07-01 14:12:38.0 +0200 @@ -13,8 +13,5 @@ b(4:2:-1)(i:i) = b(3:1:-1)(i:i) ! This fails. If the condition is printed, the result is F F F F - if (any (b .ne. (/"1","1","2","3"/))) i = 2 - print *, b - print *, b .ne. (/"1","1","2","3"/) - if (i == 2) call abort + if (any (b .ne. (/"1","1","2","3"/))) call abort end -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 12:21 --- The important question is if the testcase still ICEs with the fix reverted when you do that change. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
[Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-01 13:18 --- > The important question is if the testcase still ICEs with the fix reverted > when > you do that change. The test aborts with revisions before 161496. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592