[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-23 12:11 ---
Failure is gone.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44839

[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-07-06 14:13 
---
Don't we have middle-end/44738 for this?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44839

[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

[hjl dot tools at gmail dot com]

--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-07-06 14:28 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 Don't we have middle-end/44738 for this?
 

They didn't fail for me on 32bit hosts before.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44839

[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-07-06 15:06 
---
Bah, I would commonize these two bugs anyway, really that testcase is badly
broken essentially everywhere.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44839

[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44839