[Bug middle-end/46251] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:7276 with -funsafe-math-optimizations -mbionic and __builtin_sincosl()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03 09:57:37 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug middle-end/46251] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:7276 with -funsafe-math-optimizations -mbionic and __builtin_sincosl()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03 09:57:16 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 3 09:57:13 2010 New Revision: 166235 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166235 Log: 2010-11-03 Richard Guenther PR middle-end/46251 * builtins.c (expand_builtin_sincos): Properly build MEM_REFs, not INDIRECT_REFs. * gcc.dg/pr46251.c: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr46251.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/builtins.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug middle-end/46251] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:7276 with -funsafe-math-optimizations -mbionic and __builtin_sincosl()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-02 16:24:12 UTC --- I have a patch.
[Bug middle-end/46251] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:7276 with -funsafe-math-optimizations -mbionic and __builtin_sincosl()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-01 22:09:26 UTC --- Mine.
[Bug middle-end/46251] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:7276 with -funsafe-math-optimizations -mbionic and __builtin_sincosl()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2010.10.31 17:47:36 CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Component|target |middle-end Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-31 17:47:36 UTC --- It is caused by revision 163915: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00207.html