[Bug middle-end/50808] Diagnostic output at expansion time should be moved earlier.

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50808

Jan Hubicka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/50808] Diagnostic output at expansion time should be moved earlier.

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50808

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2011-10-20
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther  2011-10-20 
10:24:22 UTC ---
All builtin warning related stuff needs to go to
check_builtin_function_arguments
and friends.

[Bug middle-end/50808] Diagnostic output at expansion time should be moved earlier.

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50808

--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini  2011-10-20 
10:52:49 UTC ---
I think we have already in Bugzilla an old PR about a related issue, for a
specific warning.

[Bug middle-end/50808] Diagnostic output at expansion time should be moved earlier.

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50808

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek  2011-10-20 
11:41:44 UTC ---
E.g. for warning/error attribute it is very much intentional it is reported as
late as possible.

[Bug middle-end/50808] Diagnostic output at expansion time should be moved earlier.

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50808

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed|2011-10-20 00:00:00 |2021-11-28

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski  ---
>* gcc.dg/noncompile/invalid_asm.c: Likewise.
>* gcc.dg/noncompile/920507-1.c: Likewise.

These still fail with non-fat LTO.
The rest I think should not pass with non-fat LTO.