[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9/5 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 Cary Coutant ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #20 from Cary Coutant ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org --- Duplicate of PR 61321.
[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9/5 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 Cary Coutant ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #21 from Cary Coutant ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org --- Duplicate of PR 61321. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 61321 ***
[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9/5 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3 |P1 Summary|[4.9 regression] internal |[4.9/5 regression] internal |compiler error: |compiler error: |Segmentation fault (program |Segmentation fault (program |cc1plus)|cc1plus) --- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- This also happens when building the Linux kernel on ppc64 with 5.0: trippels@gcc2-power8 linux-3.17.2 % gcc -c -O2 sock.i gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1) 0x1000f7bb execute ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:2908 0x1000fd03 do_spec_1 ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:4724 0x10012807 process_brace_body ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007 0x10012807 handle_braces ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921 0x1001090f do_spec_1 ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378 0x10012807 process_brace_body ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007 0x10012807 handle_braces ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921 0x1001090f do_spec_1 ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378 0x1000ffb7 do_spec_1 ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5493 0x10012807 process_brace_body ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007 0x10012807 handle_braces ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921 0x1001090f do_spec_1 ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378 0x10012807 process_brace_body ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007 0x10012807 handle_braces ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921 0x1001090f do_spec_1 ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378 0x10012807 process_brace_body ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007 0x10012807 handle_braces ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921 0x1001090f do_spec_1 ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378 0x10012807 process_brace_body ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007 0x10012807 handle_braces ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. dmesg shows: [Nov 7 13:23] cc1[65025]: bad frame in setup_rt_frame: 3fffebfbf770 nip 10461268 lr 10465c80 Looks like a stack overflow. Adjusting importance.
[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9/5 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On x86_64:
markus@x4 /tmp % cat sock.i
struct sock
{
int sk_userlocks : 4;
} a;
const struct sock b;
void
fn1 ()
{
a.sk_userlocks = b.sk_userlocks 1;
}
markus@x4 /tmp % gcc -O2 -c sock.i
gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)
0x40c043 execute
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:2908
0x40c2f9 do_spec_1
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:4724
0x40ef96 process_brace_body
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007
0x40ef96 handle_braces
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921
0x40d0e7 do_spec_1
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378
0x40ef96 process_brace_body
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007
0x40ef96 handle_braces
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921
0x40d0e7 do_spec_1
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378
0x40cfee do_spec_1
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5493
0x40ef96 process_brace_body
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007
0x40ef96 handle_braces
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921
0x40d0e7 do_spec_1
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378
0x40ef96 process_brace_body
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007
0x40ef96 handle_braces
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921
0x40d0e7 do_spec_1
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378
0x40ef96 process_brace_body
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007
0x40ef96 handle_braces
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921
0x40d0e7 do_spec_1
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5378
0x40ef96 process_brace_body
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:6007
0x40ef96 handle_braces
../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c:5921
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9/5 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 --- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, the 5.0 issue was fixed by r217214. Maybe the fix should be backported to 4.9?
[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9/5 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #16) Hmm, the 5.0 issue was fixed by r217214. Maybe the fix should be backported to 4.9? The 5.0 issue was new in 5.0. What testcase of the very many in this bug fail with 4.9?
[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9/5 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 --- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17) (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #16) Hmm, the 5.0 issue was fixed by r217214. Maybe the fix should be backported to 4.9? The 5.0 issue was new in 5.0. What testcase of the very many in this bug fail with 4.9? The one from comment 7.
[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9/5 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 Cary Coutant ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Comment #19 from Cary Coutant ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm pretty sure that Pedro's proposed patch here -- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02279.html -- will fix this bug.
