[Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Apr 11 13:57:11 2015 New Revision: 222009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222009&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/65554 * g++.dg/opt/pr65554.C: Use __SIZE_TYPE__ instead of unsigned long. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr65554.C
[Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||public at alisdairm dot net --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 65739 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Apr 9 18:30:34 2015 New Revision: 221954 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221954&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/65554 * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op): Update comment. (fold_ctor_reference): Use STRIP_USELESS_TYPE_CONVERSION instead of STRIP_NOPS. * g++.dg/opt/pr65554.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr65554.C Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/gimple-fold.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed.
[Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Component|c++ |middle-end Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Summary|ICE: verify_gimple failed |[5 Regression] ICE: ||verify_gimple failed --- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek --- This turned out to be a bug in fold and a 5 regression; started with r213753, but the issue was probably latent. I have an untested fix.
[Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose --- wasn't sure if I should file these as regressions. first time a build with --enable-checking=yes, but it looks to me like a regression compared to a 4.9 --enable-checking=release build.
[Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.0 |--- --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Why do you think this is a regression (or recent regression)? > Already r171770 ICEs with it, r171700 does not, but it rejects the testcase > and probably doesn't really support std::initializer_list. Well, I haven't tested it with older compilers at all, because Matthias set 4.9.2 in the "known to work" field. Will leave the "Target Milestone" field untouched in the future...
[Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Why do you think this is a regression (or recent regression)? Already r171770 ICEs with it, r171700 does not, but it rejects the testcase and probably doesn't really support std::initializer_list.
[Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2015-03-25
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 tmp % cat HDCommand.ii
namespace std
{
template class initializer_list
{
int *_M_array;
int _M_len;
};
class A
{
public:
void operator=(initializer_list);
};
class B
{
void m_fn1 (A &) const;
};
void
B::m_fn1 (A &) const
{
A extra;
extra = {};
}
}
markus@x4 tmp % g++ -std=c++11 -O2 -c HDCommand.ii
HDCommand.ii: In member function ‘void std::B::m_fn1(std::A&) const’:
HDCommand.ii:18:1: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment
B::m_fn1 (A &) const
^
int
sizetype
D.2166._M_len = 0;
HDCommand.ii:18:1: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
0xcec17f verify_gimple_in_seq(gimple_statement_base*)
../../gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:4737
0xac009c gimplify_body(tree_node*, bool)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:9100
0xac0406 gimplify_function_tree(tree_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:9185
0x90c2b7 cgraph_node::analyze()
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:633
0x90f36d analyze_functions
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1023
0x90fc55 symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit()
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2435
0x6ec4c7 cp_write_global_declarations()
../../gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:4755
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See for instructions.
