[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436

2017-02-15 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law  ---
Fixed on trunk.

[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436

2017-02-15 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521

--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law  ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Feb 16 06:35:29 2017
New Revision: 245500

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245500=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79521
* ira-costs.c (scan_one_insn): Check have_regs_of_mode before calling
ira_init_register_move_cost_if_necessary.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ira-costs.c

[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436

2017-02-15 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521

--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law  ---
I'm testing a potential fix.

[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436

2017-02-15 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law  ---
*** Bug 79532 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436

2017-02-15 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||law at redhat dot com
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |law at redhat dot com

--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law  ---
It's got to be mine, even without looking at the bisection info :-)

[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436

2017-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2017-02-15
 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|--- |7.0
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
In the IL we have:
(insn 30 13 26 2 (clobber (reg:TI 123)) "rq.i":21 -1
 (nil))
(insn 26 30 27 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:TI 123) 0)
(subreg:SI (reg/v:TF 122 [ p ]) 0)) "rq.i":21 82 {*movsi_internal}
 (nil))
(insn 27 26 28 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:TI 123) 4)
(subreg:SI (reg/v:TF 122 [ p ]) 4)) "rq.i":21 82 {*movsi_internal}
 (nil))
(insn 28 27 29 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:TI 123) 8)
(subreg:SI (reg/v:TF 122 [ p ]) 8)) "rq.i":21 82 {*movsi_internal}
 (nil))
(insn 29 28 31 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:TI 123) 12)
(subreg:SI (reg/v:TF 122 [ p ]) 12)) "rq.i":21 82 {*movsi_internal}
 (nil))
(insn 31 29 36 2 (set (reg/v:DI 108 [ hp ])
(subreg:DI (reg:TI 123) 8)) "rq.i":21 81 {*movdi_internal}
 (nil))
even when TImode actually isn't supported by the target for arithmetics.