[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Fixed on trunk.
[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Feb 16 06:35:29 2017 New Revision: 245500 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245500=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/79521 * ira-costs.c (scan_one_insn): Check have_regs_of_mode before calling ira_init_register_move_cost_if_necessary. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/ira-costs.c
[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'm testing a potential fix.
[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- *** Bug 79532 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- It's got to be mine, even without looking at the bisection info :-)
[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2017-02-15 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- In the IL we have: (insn 30 13 26 2 (clobber (reg:TI 123)) "rq.i":21 -1 (nil)) (insn 26 30 27 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:TI 123) 0) (subreg:SI (reg/v:TF 122 [ p ]) 0)) "rq.i":21 82 {*movsi_internal} (nil)) (insn 27 26 28 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:TI 123) 4) (subreg:SI (reg/v:TF 122 [ p ]) 4)) "rq.i":21 82 {*movsi_internal} (nil)) (insn 28 27 29 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:TI 123) 8) (subreg:SI (reg/v:TF 122 [ p ]) 8)) "rq.i":21 82 {*movsi_internal} (nil)) (insn 29 28 31 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:TI 123) 12) (subreg:SI (reg/v:TF 122 [ p ]) 12)) "rq.i":21 82 {*movsi_internal} (nil)) (insn 31 29 36 2 (set (reg/v:DI 108 [ hp ]) (subreg:DI (reg:TI 123) 8)) "rq.i":21 81 {*movdi_internal} (nil)) even when TImode actually isn't supported by the target for arithmetics.