[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #6 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 44485 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44485&action=edit another failing output I'm attaching another file suffering from the same issue (mostly every cpp file has this failure) this file is only ~2Mb, so maybe reducing it might be easier
[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Gianfranco from comment #6) > Created attachment 44485 [details] > another failing output > > I'm attaching another file suffering from the same issue (mostly every cpp > file has this failure) > this file is only ~2Mb, so maybe reducing it might be easier Needs reduction.
[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Unfortunately I can't reproduce that with cross compiler.
[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > Unfortunately I can't reproduce that with cross compiler. Me neither today. Gianfranco , could you check if you are running out of memory on the machine that you are doing this on with GCC-8 ? Is there a chance that the OOM killer came along when building this file on the native arm machine that you were running this on ? I've tried running this with stock gcc 8 in debian on an armhf docker image and will try building something up later today on my machine , but it may be worth double checking that something like an OOM killer or swap isn't what's throttling the build here.
[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2018-10-11 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Tip of gcc-8 isn't failing. So until we have more info - this one is waiting I'm afraid.
[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #11 from Gianfranco --- I would avoid an OOM issue, because even trying to compile a single file makes it fail... I'm trying again the same build with updated gcc and I'll report back.
[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Gianfranco --- Fortunately this seems to be not an issue anymore, with latest toolchain fixes... I still have a test failure, probably due to unaligned armhf access. Closing as fixed (not sure if in qt side or gcc side, but now it builds correctly with the same configuration as the one who caused this bug, only toolchain updated!) thanks you all G.
